It's not Share's fault that she doesn't understand the conceptual difference between the two - she has never tried to have a "discussion."
________________________________ From: Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:51 AM Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different strokes for different folks. ________________________________ From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" <authfri...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > >turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. >But I don't think of that as lying. > > >I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and >say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a >liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat >any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after >deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for >having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake... > > > > > > >________________________________ > From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: >>> >>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either >>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE >>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a >>> convoluted way that he's dishonest. >> >>All while having a discussion with the person >>she claimed only yesterday she was never going >>to discuss *anything* with until he either >>documented something or retracted it. He >>did neither. >> >>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle. >> >> > >