My guess Share, is that she is trying to help you see yourself and asking you to employ a more complete thought process around your presentation here on FFL. You are all reaction, my dear. I empathize and I sympathize. P.S. Doesn't "authfriend" mean "authentic friend?"
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: If that is true, dmevans, then why does Judy continue conversing with me?! On Sunday, October 13, 2013 10:50 AM, "dmevans365@..." <dmevans365@...> wrote: Oh dear. Share, you pathologically rewrite the facts, intentions, and motivations behind what *you*, *yourself*, present (whether it is true or not is of no bearing on this behavior) and then you present your new position and start to support that, no matter how hopeless it is as a supposed defense to the original false position. And this goes on and on and on with you, until conversing with you is an exercise in such absurdity that it is pointless to continue. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Too?! Oh, ok, Judy, sorry to hear you're feeling poorly this morning. I guess that's why you did that bit of Inadvertent Irony about butting in. On Sunday, October 13, 2013 9:46 AM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote: Wow, Share is feeling pretty poorly this morning too. Share wrote: > Richard to Judy on Oct 2:Does every message posted to this discussion group > have to turn > into an argument with you? Are you the new FFL moderator? > > Is it alright > with you Judy, if I have a one minute conversation with Share - just one > minute- > without you butting in to start another fight. Barry wrote: (snip) > Ahem. > > Barry has not mentioned or interacted with either > of these bitches in quite some time, certainly not > during the last week. Thus this attempt to "get" > him and revive their long-held grudges against him > is completely gratuitous and out of the blue. Hey, doofus, nobody was talking to you. End of story.
