Whomever gave you the dressing down only needs to look at a few news articles
about the current state of India to know that neither Marshy nor any of these
other supposed god men has done a damn thing to "save" India.
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 10/24/13, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Om "embedded" in the tanakh?
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 24, 2013, 11:07 AM
So[m], what was Maharishi's particular
teaching on "Om"? His was counter to
everything "Om", wasn't it. He did not
use "Om" in any of the mantras he gave.
Succinctly, what was that? What is unique about
his Vedic studies around "Om"? I got a
dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India
around the understanding of "Om". What
did he say that "Om" "aum" was so bad
that puts him opposed to "Om"? While at the
same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru Dev] it seems was very
in favor of "Om" spiritually. See Guru
Dev's discourses. Who do you believe? What
is your experience with "Om"? I find it the
vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over
in the center of the Earth and unified sound of all of
Nature and great to attune to as such to spin and line up
the chakras of the subtle system . It seems the
energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on
earth have evolved with. It runs deep as a vibration
(when people sit up) in the Dome as a vortex.
Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to
"Om" for the TM spiritual community. Does
that explain something about the TM community? What is
your experience with it and what was really said about it?
Just wondering, -Buck
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,
<cardemaister@...> wrote:
(Not to be taken
all too seriously...)
Just as 'om' may be "embedded"
in the word 'soma',so in the tanakh
(Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament)it may be embedded
in the word 'yom' (day) that
appearsseveral times in the first verses of
bereshit (Genesis)...
