A-U-M is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end of all creation.  
MMY once described AUM (paraphrased) like hearing a City from a distance, you 
can hear the drone of the City, only when you get up close can you distinguish 
the individual sounds. These individual sounds are the sounds of creation and 
the Ved, these individual sound vibrations ARE the Vedic Gods.
 

 The Divine Mother is the source/essence/substance of them all;  all is AUM, 
and AUM is all.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 SSRS teaches techniques that are very similar to the TM practice of MMY.  It's 
a matter of positioning and placement, Sudarsha Kriya is a hatha yoga asana and 
involves rhythmic breathing techniques in Vajrasana and Sukhasana. It's not 
complicated.
 
 The similarity to Buddhist Yoga is obvious. It has already been established 
that SK and TM are just common Indian meditation exercises designed to relieve 
stress, similar to Buddhist meditation practices such as Kum Nye and Vippasana. 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kum_Nye http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kum_Nye
 
 However, it is doubtful that SSRS was ever initiated into any esoteric tantric 
school, so he wouldn't be knowing any secret bija mantras that he could issue 
with any authority. Everyone knows you have to agree to a non-disclosure 
agreement in order to learn from an authentic tantric guru. Go figure.
 
 But, for the average pundit, espousing on OM seems an easy thing to 
pontificate about. After all, it worked for Lobsang Rampa and the Zen Master 
Rama. LoL!
 
 
 
 On 10/24/2013 8:06 AM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote:
 
   SSRS, a vedic pandit, has given out OM as part of traditional
 maha-mantras. After receiving one from him, I asked the OM 
 
 question to a sankhya-yoga scholar, a former TMer and student of SSRS. He said 
"No possible problem if included within a traditional maha-mantra ... like om 
namo bhagavate vasudevaya."
 
 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
<authfriend@...> mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
 He said OM was a mantra for recluses, I believe. It's in Beacon Light of
 the Himalayas.
 
 Buck wrote:
 
 So[m],  what was Maharishi's particular teaching on "Om"?  His was counter to 
everything "Om", wasn't it.  He did not use "Om" in any of the mantras he gave. 
 Succinctly, what was that?  What is unique about his Vedic studies around 
"Om"?  I got a dressing down recently about how Maharishi saved India around 
the understanding of  "Om".  What did he say that "Om" "aum" was so bad that 
puts him opposed to "Om"?   While at the same time Brahmananda Saraswati [Guru 
Dev] it seems was very in favor of "Om" spiritually.  See Guru Dev's 
discourses.   Who do you believe?  What is your experience with "Om"?  I find 
it the vibration of the giant electro-magnet of nature turning over in the 
center of the Earth and unified sound of all of Nature and great to attune to 
as such to spin and line up the chakras of the subtle system .  It seems the 
energetic pre-condition that all the nervous systems on earth have evolved 
with.  It runs deep as a vibration (when people sit up) in the Dome as a 
vortex.   Maharishi seems to have put the wammy of fear in to "Om" for the TM 
spiritual community.  Does that explain something about the TM community?  What 
is your experience with it and what was really said about it?  Just wondering, 
-Buck  
 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
<cardemaister@...> mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
 (Not to be taken all too seriously...) 
 
 Just as 'om' may be "embedded" in the word 'soma',
 so in the tanakh (Hebrew Bible =~ Old Testament)
 it may be embedded in the word 'yom' (day) that appears
 several times in the first verses of bereshit (Genesis)...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to