Yeah, this is stuff I'm making up.
Washington - Senate Democrats voted unanimously three years ago to
support the Obamacare rule that is largely responsible for some of the
health insurance cancellation letters that are going out...
'Senate Democrats supported rule that led to insurance cancellations'
CNN Politics:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/
<http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/31/senate-democrats-supported-rule-that-lead-to-insurance-cancellations/>
On 11/1/2013 1:30 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
*
*
*
*Richard wrote:*
Your lie detector must be on the blink, Judy. Bottom line is, Obama
baldly lied repeatedly, beyond doubt, and he should be impeached
because of it.
You are usually on top of people telling lies, but you seem to have
really dropped the ball on this one. The question is, did the entire
administration know it was a lie and why did they do it? Go figure.
'Joe Scarborough Finally Admits Obama Lied About ObamaCare'
Newsbusters:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare
<http://newsbusters.org/blogs/paul-bremmer/2013/10/30/joe-scarborough-finally-admits-obama-lied-about-obamacare>
On 11/1/2013 11:32 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
It's nowhere /near/ that, doc. It's only people who have individual
plans who are subject to it, and they're a very small percentage of
the market.
Plus which, some of it is indeed "bad actors," insurance companies
that try to make these people believe their only option is a much
more expensive one than the one that was canceled, when actually the
companies have cheaper plans that meet the ACA standards and that are
not that much more expensive although they provide a lot better
coverage than the plan that was canceled (which will very likely save
them money.in the longer run).
I can't speak to your particular situation, but if you are genuinely
getting stuck with much higher premiums but not much better coverage,
you're among a very small group.
We'd all be better off with single-payer, but the bottom line is that
with ACA, most people will benefit.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>,
<fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
OK - let's say it is just half of that - 45 million, which sounds
closer, anyway. It is a rigged game. Any policies that don't carry
all the coverages that are now federally mandated, must be cancelled,
as mine was, and reissued. It is not 'bad actors', as the prez is
saying - It is federal law, which he signed into place.
It gets better. Then, when the policy is reissued, surprise, now,
more than double. Subsidies are only available on the more expensive
plans, anyway. My "choice", subsidized, or not, is basic insurance,
with a $5000 annual deductible, for $560/mo. I'd have to spend almost
$12,000, per year, before getting a dollar reimbursed.
No thanks. Gee, I feel so grateful for 'health reform'.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>,
<fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
*"93 million"?? Are you nuts? From which right-wing extremist liars
did you get this bit of ridiculous misinformation?*
*
*
*Come on, Mike, let's see some attribution here.*
Mike wrote:
> Oh come on dude. If you like your insurance , you can keep it, period.
Just because the administration
> knew in '10 that 93 million would probably lose it, well.... that's
just
a *glitch*.
