Huh? No, just the bible.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Think it should be "bhagavad gita" and "the veda" and "the upanishads" and "the koran" and "tao te ching" too? Or should we lower-case only the scriptures you don't like? How about "the declaration of independence"? "romeo and juliet"? "to kill a mockingbird"? How about "mein kampf"? Come on, man. Capitalizing a title doesn't signify approval of the contents. Doc wrote: > Given the well intentioned, but chaotic writings of the book, it hardly > seems appropriate to capitalize "the > bible". It is considered scripture by many, but is such a mangled mess of consciousness, through endless additions and translations, that it provides little more than a series of deep thoughts. I would never take such an anecdotal collection as an authority, for anything. Common sense, experience, and reflection are far better teachers. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: You're talking apples and oranges, sorry, your comparisons don't work. Even both doctors in the video admitted that there is NO benchmark to establish the veracity of trangenderism, it's considered a disorder, it may very well be, but does that justify cutting off ones penis shaft? The world at large is ignorant of that which brings REAL happiness, including the parents (who abdicated their parental role to a mere child) and the 'Doctor' who later enabled this mixed up child to becomes neither a full MAN or WOMAN. It is now an *IT* or a hybrid if you will, not natural at all for the human kingdom IMHO. Doesn't mean you don't love someone like that or give them all the respect a human being deserves, for even the Bible admonishes us to love our neighbors as ourselves. This is a discussion about the subject, not an effort to be judgmental. "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?" King James In a much more esoteric explanation, a human is more than just a 'physical' body, they have a *matrix* (the subtle etheric body) from which this human body is formed, "how do you change that???" That archetype determined that that physical body shall be male or female, nothing will change that, IMO and understanding. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Complicated subject wgm, and not one that you or I could give any definitive reading on. If you disagree with people modifying their bodies with surgery and hormones then you must certainly have a problem with those who use artificial limbs, indulge in plastic surgery, use hormones as a means of birth control or for treating prostate cancer (among other things), not to mention people who wear hair pieces. For that matter, allowing two separate humans procreate to create a third person who is a byproduct of two genetic pools might be a bit iffy...who knows if any of this would be in 'God's plan'. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: I found this story to be rather disturbing in that the 'parents' were acting more as 'enablers' (as well as the doctors). It reminded me of the fabled story of the Lost Continent of Atlantis where they were creating men that were half animal and half man. Ultimately nature (the Gods, or the laws of nature) destroyed Atlantis in an effort to maintain balance in the World. Transgendered Humans are 'mans' creation, not God's, as such it throws off the balance and equilibrium of what MMY called the "Divine Plan", these *hormone modified humans* are an invention of Man, can you imagine what will happen when we are able to make *genetically modified humans*, all kinds of freaks will appear unless we cooperate with natural law to the best of our ability to understand that law. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <emilymaenot@...> wrote: Thanks for posting. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epDPui27QZQ