Us?!
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 12:54 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: Then who did, such that you were motivated to inform us that it wasn't the case? You really are having difficulty saying anything halfway sensible today, aren't you? (Not that there's that much difference from all other days.) Share thrashed: > Judy, I don't believe I suggested that you did, did I? ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote: > > >I don't believe I suggested parents were the only source of stress and trauma >during childhood, did I? > > >Share blubbered: > > >> That's great Judy. But parents aren't the only sources of stress and trauma >> in >>> childhood. >> > > > >On Saturday, November 16, 2013 11:47 AM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> >wrote: > > >P.S.: You're quite right about my childhood, albeit not in the way you hope. I >had a happy, stress-free childhood with two parents who loved me deeply and >steadfastly. They passed on their own devotion to authenticity and loathing of >phoniness to me. > > > > >---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote: > > >(snicker) Thanks for proving my point, Share. You're so dependable in that >regard. > > > >---In [email protected], <sharelong60@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>Judy, imo your self righteousness with regards to authenticity is itself >>>>proof of over compensation. Your alleged devotion to authenticity and your >>>>opinions of me also imo are both results of your childhood. And that's all >>>>I'm going to say. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On Saturday, November 16, 2013 11:10 AM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>Let me just put it this way, Share. I think your actual motivations for the >>>>way you respond to people are quite different from what you claim. I think >>>>most of your behavior on FFL is carefully tailored to attempt to make >>>>people think highly of you. The problem is that when your control slips, >>>>you show a completely different face. >>>> >>>> >>>>That's all I'll say for now, except to note that the quality in people I >>>>value most highly is authenticity, and the quality I most despise is lack >>>>of same. An inauthentic pose of virtue, as far as I'm concerned, is far >>>>more reprehensible than an authentic, let-it-all-hang-out display of vice. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>---In [email protected], <sharelong60@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>Judy, a way more interesting question imho is why do you even care what I >>>>think turq thinks. Should I even feed your strange interest by answering >>>>you? What the heck: I doubt turq thinks about me much. Probably he hasn't >>>>changed his mind. But so what? See, I think in your mind that means I >>>>should be mean to him and not say thanks for a post I like, etc. But for me >>>>it's important to tell people when I like their posts. It's also important >>>>for me to disagree with people who are ganging up on someone. I'm sure >>>>there's a karmic reason but I don't need to figure it out for now. It feels >>>>right when I do both and that's why I do them. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On Saturday, November 16, 2013 9:26 AM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>Say, Share, another question I asked you yesterday that you didn't respond >>>>to: Do you think Barry has changed his mind about you since his "SHUT THE >>>>FUCK UP" post? >>>> >>>> >>>>Share fawned: >>>> >>>> >>>>> 7 posts this morning! This is one of the qualities I like about turq, his >>>>> generosity, and that his >>>>> posts are often about fascinating stuff. That's all I got for now (-: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:42 AM, TurquoiseB <turquoiseb@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>How many minions does it take to change a light bulb? Or into one? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > >
