---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote:

 Ann, I was making reference to some TV shows in which people become drug 
dealers to support their family.
 

 But TV shows aren't real life, at least the last time I checked.

Selfish is a strange word. But I agree with you that if people are truly 
selfish, then they take good care of themselves. And that benefits others. One 
of life's wonderful ironies!
 

 But I didn't say that. I never said to be selfish is to "take good care of 
themselves", in fact, in the case of addicts they make all the wrong decisions. 
They hurt those who love them, they abandon them emotionally if not physically, 
they degrade their bodies, imperil their jobs and the list goes on and on. When 
you are an addict nobody benefits, at least in the short term. With luck and a 
lot of grace one can emerge stronger, smarter, wiser and so can those who love 
the addict but it is a damn hard and long road and that particular journey does 
not end with abstinence.

Lots of snow outside. Walked to town flying hall with my neighbor Wes. I was 
headed into a drift when he came along! After program, got my car out of 
another drift. Yay!


 

 
 
 On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 8:35 AM, "awoelflebater@..." 
<awoelflebater@...> wrote:
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote:

 Seraph, though it may well be true that drug dealers are selfish, I don't 
think that label, or any labels really, are gonna be much help in dealing with 
the problem.
 

 I think the idea was that addicts were "selfish", we already know dealers 
don't give a crap about their customers. Addicts are only selfish in that their 
world revolves around having the drug of their choice. In this, they are 
willing to give up everything to have that drug; it is their best friend and it 
is essential to their very existence, or so they believe. So, in this way 
addicts are willing to turn their backs on all else that might be important and 
vital in their lives in order to stay prostrating themselves at the altar of 
their chosen addictive substance. But, that is not "selfish" to me as much as 
it is blind and indicative of overwhelming with need.

Drug users need to be helped on the physiological level as well as 
psychological. These addictions, even behavior ones like gambling, have strong 
chemical bases.
 

 I think this is a well-established fact.

I agree with you that people will look for someone to blame. But I think that 
the screwedupness or imbalances of our whole society is to blame. For example, 
why do people become drug dealers? I've heard that it's to support their family!
 

 Huh?

I'm making a joke but I do think the financial imbalances create a lot of fear 
and desperation in people. And then people take desperate measures.
 

 I've completely lost you here.


 

 
 
 On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:51 PM, "s3raphita@..." <s3raphita@...> wrote:
 
   Re "There was a mad rush to find the dealers who sold him the drug.":
 

 My thoughts exactly. If the pusher is caught he's going to have the book 
thrown at him. Prepare yourself for some cringe-making playing to the gallery 
in the court as the dealer is cast as the scum of the earth. 
 Hoffman was a fully-paid-up adult and has to take responsibility for his own 
actions. What led him to addiction can only be known by his close family and 
friends and I'm not in the business of judging his choices (though his now not 
being there for his children is the real tragedy).
 

 One psychologist who specialised in drug users came to the conclusion that 
those who allow drugs to dominate their lives are essentially *selfish*. 
Although that sounds simplistic and "judgemental" it has the ring of truth to 
it as far as I'm concerned.
 

 I first seriously noticed Hoffman in The Talented Mr. Ripley which remains one 
of my very favourite modern films. Playing an obnoxious Yank abroad he 
dominated every scene he appeared in.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq462kfFKI8 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq462kfFKI8


 














 


 










Reply via email to