I understand. I might suggest that there was a side of him that you missed. Whether it would have changed your outlook on him, I don't know. In general, I think that part of what he had to offer (namely some of the knowledge stuff) has pretty much been obscured.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote: I have no idea - I just like this guy's writing about being Indian and that's about it. I have major doubts about M's knowledge - I am getting info recently that he was a master at getting info out of a variety of people and passing it off as his own. As to the esoteric nature of what is discussed about the Vedas, I have no idea - all above my head. -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 2/12/14, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... <steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@...> wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: VERY interesting take on the vedas by an Indian writer To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2014, 2:08 AM Hey Michael (or anyone else) I skimmed the article, but are you familiar with Maharishi's commentary about the first word of Rig Veda, "Agni"? And if so, do you think it's just a bunch of BS. This is not a trick question. I'm not saying that it was a stroke of genius. I'm not making any judgments about it. I'm just kind of curious what your take might be on it, if you"re familiar with it, that is.
