Isn't it fascinating how the same old arguments come up, followed by the same old justifications and apologetics, over and over and over and over and over and over?
And the people running the cult apologetics number seem to be completely unaware that they have *patterns* that define their behavior, patterns that allow anyone who has been watching for some time to predict those patterns in advance. For example, knowing that the "pandit riots" would cause the TBs here to freak out and thus jumpstart another round of their completely predictable behaviors, I described them *beforehand* in the following post: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/377151 How many of the posts made by Judy, Jim, and Ann in the time since fall into one or more of the six categories I defined in that post? How many posts have any of them made that *don't* fall into these six categories? ________________________________ From: "geezerfr...@yahoo.com" <geezerfr...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 5:20 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: No Mantra will cure willfully arrogant stupidity Checked in to see what was going on at FFL today and low and behold, it's the mantra meaning debate! I've posted this before some years back but for me it was settled once and for all back in 1976 when I received my 4th "advanced technique". I was waiting in line to see MMY when the guy in front of me, a friend of mine, said "ask him the meaning, he'll tell you." MMY gave me the new variation of my mantra (it was now Sri Aing Namah Namah) and I quietly said "what is the meaning?" MMY said "Glorious Saraswati I bow down to you again and again. {pause} Do not dwell." At the time I was totally thrilled since I LOVED the idea of worshipping the goddess Saraswati. It was only much later that I began to think about the fact that I had been telling all of my students that they were meaningless sounds. Many years later, when the mantra tables were revealed, it was easy to decipher the meaning of all of them.
