--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "bostonbob53" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't help but be amused by Pall's latest posting. It is so clear > to me that he just wants to be told what to do! Funny (odd). If you read Tom's actual words, without filters about him and other issues, I don't see that. It appears to me that Tom is happy that the group is answering his questions. And that they appear to have a systematic approach. Do A, then do B. Sort of like the rec to do asnanas, then pranyam, then med. That is, the sequence has been found to be effective. Personally, I see merit in the appraoch, compared to groups that only offer a menu only of yagyas, where experienced guidance is not offered. >If you read > the "instructions" he has been given, that yagna group is just > setting him up for the "Lakshmi wasn't pleased with you. > You have to do more yagyas." scam. I missed that. It appears to me that he is told not to do the volitional yagyas until his natal and transit planets are "purified". They recommended not doing the volitional until "stage I" was complete. They told him "hold up, don't spend your money now when its not effective". Doesn't sound like a particularly manipulative, out for a buck, excuse-prone group to me. Where is the basis for "excuses" when stage II volitional yagyas are begun. They can't credibly say the stage II yagyas did not work because he needs more stage I, if they have clearly said, stage I is complete, well done, finished. I see just the opposite from you -- less grounds for excuses should stage II not prove effective. Again, read his actual words, not pre-existingd suppositions about Tom or yagya group motives. > Can't you just see it coming? No. Not really. Not at al. In fact it says a lot about your pre-existing slant on things than on Tom and/ or yagyas / yagya groups. >Apparently > Pall can't. They got him so busy he doesn't have time to think, > reflect, examine, question. And how do they have him so busy? I missed that too. And Tom is asking lots of questions, And getting answers. How exactly that a situation no thinking, reflecting, examining, questioning? > Why why why don't people want to think for themselves? A quesion you might ask yourself. You are not quesioning your pre-existing mindsets and are unable, apparently, to read the words on the page. > It seems > that Pall was pissed at Ben Collins because he wouldn't feed him the > answers he wanted to hear. Or, he didn't get any answers. Where do you dig up "answers he wanted to hear thing"? Again, it appears to be a pre-eixiting thing in your head. Not in the words themselves. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
