No, just making an observation given what you said about detectives assuming the first version of a story is the most accurate one, which I thought was interesting given Share's take on her kerfuffle with Robin. No comment from you necessary.
I am curious as to what you thought you were debating with me about, though, regarding the Maharishi story. Oh right, you just wanted me to go beat up on Share? Fair enough. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : What debate? I wasn't debating anything with you, just pointing out that there were multiple versions of the Beatles-leaving-Maharishi story. What that got to do with anything? Other than deflecting the debate.... Well, you might have a bit of a conflict with Share about this. Her infamous accusation that she had been "psychologically raped" by Robin emerged a month after the fact. At the time, what he'd said was no more than a minor irritation, and she apologized to Robin for being grumpy, blaming it on having had too much sugar the previous day. Whatever happend re Mia Farrow: I don't care what she thinks of it now, what she said at the time was fascinating. Did she make it up and change her mind or was she persuaded to by everyone else? We will never know but I'd always take the closest account of something to the time it was supposed to have happened as being the most accurate, any detective will tell you that. Memory is unreliable and impressionable.
