BTW, I didn't start this discussion with Salyavin; he did. (There you go, Barry, I just saved you an Oooooopsie.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : Like Curtis, Salyavin tends to become intellectually dishonest when he encounters any kind of conflict. If anyone wants to see why this post of Salyavin's is intellectually dishonest, here's the post of mine he was responding to: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/380512 https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/380512 Among other things, I told him explicitly that it was OK if he chose to stick with his ignorance. IOW, there was nothing dragging him into continuing the discussion. He's made it clear he doesn't want to be bothered informing himself about the strongest arguments for theism. That's fine; he's welcome to just piddle along striking down straw men left and right and giving himself medals for doing so. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : I can't be bothered to get dragged into another yet another tedious groundhog day with you. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : Er, no. Look, I know it's difficult for you to have your ignorance exposed like this Yawn.
