I canceled my cleaning appointment earlier in the month. I read up that for most people (probably me) once a year is enough according to recent research. At that they add whiting so they can charge more. The dentist originally said x-rays every two years and I guess revenues were short so they shortened that to yearly. The dentist also wants to replace a crown but at this time I'm not experiencing any problems. Dentistry is definitely a big for profit enterprise even if they say they're not.

On 04/30/2014 01:42 PM, lengli...@cox.net wrote:

The video on the website makes it clear that they are looking for young people to become TM teachers, not people approaching 60.


Besides, if I had $1,500 to spend, I'd get my crumbling tooth addressed. The charity dental service in my town wants to charge me 50% and since my cash income per month is literally zero, I'm unable to get a crown, or even a filling (needs a crown, though they'll probably just pull it as that is what low-income clinics do).

L


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote :

*From:* Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:07 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] New York TM teaching is maxed out

Your scenario is much more likely than the TM spin - its amazing how shameless they are in screwing even their own people. And of course the TM movement gets paid *full price* for the course anyway. The people stuck holding the bag and paying for it will be those stupid enough to sign up for the "bargain" TM teacher training course.

I've got an idea. Why doesn't LAWSON sign up for this course? He's the one talking about how big a bargain it is, right? And he's never become a TM teacher, so this is finally his chance to become one. Then he could keep us abreast of all developments as he's assigned to teach somewhere and paid a living wage for the two-year indentured servant period he's signed up for.

But wait...that would imply that *he* actually believed in this "offer," wouldn't it? And that he's willing to put his financial future on the line to prove it. Guess that's right out... :-)
--------------------------------------------

    On Wed, 4/30/14, TurquoiseBee <turquoiseb@...> wrote:

    Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] New York TM teaching is maxed out
    To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
    Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2014, 9:00 AM

    From: salyavin808
    <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
    To:
    FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wednesday, April
    30, 2014 10:46 AM
    Subject: Re:
    [FairfieldLife] New York TM teaching is maxed out

    It's most likely true that the TMO have a lot of demand at the
    moment, they have a great PR team and loads of celebrities
    saying they do it and like it. Everyone likes celeb's,
    look at what the Beatles did for the TMO, now they've
    got Russell Brand, how can they fail!

    On the
    other hand, why should we or anyone else *believe* these
    stories about the numbers of people learning TM? It's
    NOT as if they have a track record for telling the truth.

    Or has everyone forgotten
    the lame attempt to co-opt some Mayan prophecy by claiming
    in press releases that they had gathered a group of
    "10,000 Mayans" practicing the TMSP? Then they
    published an actual photo of the "event"
    that showed at most 200 to 300 people. The TM movement lies
    all the time. Why should anyone believe anything their
    fanatical True Believers claim now?

    Also, regarding this latest "low
    cost" attempt to create new TM teachers, does anyone
    remember the *last* time the TM movement promised teachers
    "full time work?" The teachers had to quit their
    existing jobs and commit to working for the TMO full-time,
    and were guaranteed a livable salary. No one ever got paid,
    and the whole scam was abandoned within a few months and
    never mentioned again. My suspicion is that this is exactly
    what is going to happen to the poor schmucks who believe the
    sales spiel and take out loans for this course, believing
    that the loans will be "written off" after a
    couple of years of teaching full-time. There won't be
    any *need* for their teaching, and they -- who are after all
    the ones who signed the loan papers -- will be stuck having
    to repay them.








Reply via email to