turq, good point and I agree that we're all the same on some level. But if I 
have a toothache for example, I'd rather consult with a good dentist rather 
than a good podiatrist. My bad?

On Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:53 AM, "TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 


  
On Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:33 AM, "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: 
In range and distribution of illumined Batgap interviewees by types, just 
throwing these Batgap illumined people interviewed thus far on a scatter graph 
by their experience and spiritual affect on others,  it seems observable that 
some of the awakened are more proactive in affect as teachers, some are long 
time practiced at helping others spiritually and/or transformational for others 
just by being of a field effect of presence.  Some of them are teachers in 
nature of character, while some may glow in the closet and watch sort of like 
Harri by experience was for so long.  Others transformational in effect like a 
Janet Sussman also from childhood or Connie Huebner from younger or Ammachi 
from way back, yet different from glowing in the closet each in their lives 
have been engaged teaching in formats with spiritual experience, techniques and 
scholarship to be of help to others for much of their lives,  Batgap is a 
fabulous oral archive around this range
 of spiritual possibility within humanity based on a scale of abiding 
experience and spiritual transformational affect.  It is useful for parsing to 
see them in a range and distribution of,  Teachers -Gurus -Sat Gurus -Jagad 
Gurus by scale of transformational affect.  

Just as a question, wouldn't it be more interesting to consider the possibility 
that everyone Rick has ever interviewed is Just Another Human Being, whose 
experiences are in no way any "better" or "higher" than any others? 

In other words, it seems to me that Buck is still arguing for the elitism 
approach, trying to categorize these folks into "higher/lower" and 
"better/worse" pigeonholes so that people like him can look up to some of
 them and look down on others. Wouldn't it be more...uh, dare I say 
it...enlightened to consider them all at exactly the same level -- just human 
beings having an opinion based on their individual interpretations of their 
respective subjective experiences?



Reply via email to