Again, I reiterate my contention that those who seem to have the most fixed ideas of "What enlightenment is" on this forum are those who have never in their lives experienced it, only been told about it and fantasized about it.
Again, this BS of yours - you have experienced "enlightenment" for two weeks out of your life - not only that, it was under specialized conditions, not in real life. So quit trying to insinuate yourself as an expert here, when you have not yet achieved your first step, as a seeker - established silence, witnessing 24 x 7. It embarrasses us all, to watch you act like this, both arrogant, and empty. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote : From: "curtisdeltablues@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 12:24 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Curtis, on "witnessing" ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote : Lawson, Curtis and others, do you think a FULLY developed human has an unconscious or subconscious? I think that such a person would be fully conscious of their entire inner world. C: The term fully developed is not meaningful for me. It is in the same class and the concept of being "saved" for me. The term is *intentionally* vague, so that the True Believer can fit any fantasy of "What life will be like when I'm finally enlightened" into it. Again, I reiterate my contention that those who seem to have the most fixed ideas of "What enlightenment is" on this forum are those who have never in their lives experienced it, only been told about it and fantasized about it.
