Some nasty cracks in this article, but he does voice a
grave concern in Western Europe regarding a Muslim
underclass. They don't/can't assimilate into the
dominant culture and are really frustrated at their
outcast status.

--- Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Paris Burns Again
> 
> Let's Roast Frankfurters
> 
> 
> by Fred Reed
> 
> November 7, 2005
> 
> Paris burns, crackling and popping as merrily as a
> Yule log when  
> England was still Merrie and still English. Moslems
> prance about  
> setting things alight, cars incinerate briskly, and
> the police suck  
> their thumbs. Diversity. Oh yes. And more to come.
> 
> Time and again these days, national governments let
> in all sorts of  
> people who belong somewhere else. Pretty soon the
> country has so many  
> that the government comes to fear them. At that
> point the problem  
> passes beyond easy solution. So politicians paper
> over everything,  
> and make concessions to buy a year’s peace. The
> newcomers breed and  
> increase. By and by the remaining possibilities are
> acquiescence or  
> civil war.
> 
> Which latter, boys and girls, isn’t impossible.
> 
> The assiduously courted invasion usually rests on a
> curious idealism  
> that I find hard to credit in adults. The notion is
> that we are all  
> just people, brothers under the skin, that all we
> need is love and  
> understanding, black and white together, kum bah ya;
> only a few  
> reactionary forces need to be stilled to bring about
> universal bliss.  
> This happy thought doesn’t surprise me among
> students in high school.  
> Politicians aren’t.
> 
> Has no one noticed that diversity doesn’t work?
> Putting together  
> peoples with little in common begs for trouble,
> usually with success.  
> It is the chief source of the world’s bloodshed and
> enmity.
> 
> Look around you. Start with Canada, where the Brits
> and French detest  
> each other. Drop down to the USA, where black,
> white, and brown wait  
> uneasily for no one is sure what; the lid is held on
> by Washington,  
> which acts as a sort of federal Tito. There are
> Hindus and Moslems in  
> India, Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, blacks and
> whites in South  
> Africa, Moslems and Buddhists in Thailand, Turks and
> Germans in  
> Germany, Vietnamese and Montagnards in Vietnam,
> Moslems and animists  
> in the Sudan, Jews and Moslems in Israel, Cambodians
> and Vietnamese  
> in Cambodia, Protestants and Catholics in Ireland,
> Indians and  
> Mexicans in Chiapas, Basques and Spaniards in Spain,
> Indians and  
> Fijians in Fiji.
> 
> But what have facts to do with foreign relations? It
> is much more  
> entertaining to base policy on adolescent theories
> and see what happens.
> 
> When the anticipated melding fails and riots ensue,
> the response is  
> to try to buy, or legislate, the impossible.
> Invariably the cry  
> arises that the government hasn’t done enough for
> the indigent  
> arrivals. We must spend more money on welfare, on
> schools, on special  
> programs to raise the unraisable and mix the
> immiscible. It is our  
> fault really. We need to change our outmoded
> attitudes, require  
> classes on ethnic sensitivity, celebrate the culture
> of the new  
> incompatibles. We will have National Islamic History
> Week, and  
> children will make mosques from construction paper.
> That will fix  
> everything.
> 
> Instead the problem gets worse. The majority
> population becomes  
> angrier, but has no recourse. The government is
> against them. The  
> immigrants can loot and burn, and nothing is likely
> to happen to  
> them: Punishing their misbehavior would engender
> more violence, which  
> the government wants to avoid at any cost. If the
> citizenry defend  
> themselves, as for example by shooting arsonists,
> the government will  
> put them in prison. Citizens have much to lose; the
> malefactors do not.
> 
> A spring is thus wound.
> 
> Moslems in particular are poison. A failed
> civilization, Islam sends  
> its unsuccessful, thus double failures, to Europe.
> They gravitate to  
> slums because they can do nothing else. Cohesive,
> angry, ineffectual,  
> with no loyalty to their new home, they neither
> flourish nor  
> assimilate. Resentment grows among them. And so the
> cities burn.
> 
> Which is interesting. In the United States, the
> hostility of Islam is  
> often attributed to American support of Israel.
> Beyond doubt, there  
> is truth in this. It does not explain the riots in
> Paris, the papered- 
> over violence in other European countries, the
> Islamic terrorism in  
> Russia and in southern Thailand, the anti-Christian
> fighting in East  
> Timor, or the terror in Kashmir. Moslems are
> trouble.
> 
> Immigration is not prima facie a bad idea. It
> depends on who you let  
> in. Some immigrants can assimilate. If for example
> the United States  
> allows the entry of moderate numbers of reasonably
> educated Chinese,  
> nothing untoward will happen. The Chinese share such
> crucial European  
> traits as studiousness and respect for law. In fact
> they are superior  
> to the white population in both respects.
> Consequently they arouse  
> little hostility and not a little admiration. They
> may congregate for  
> a generation or so in Chinatown, but the term
> designates a place  
> where a lot of Chinese live, not a hostile ghetto.
> 
> Other immigrants cannot assimilate. Most especially
> practitioners of  
> Islam cannot prosper in Europe. Watch.
> 
> Incomprehensibly, permitting their entry has been a
> deliberate  
> decision. Europe could have kept these swarming
> newcomers out by  
> simply not letting them in. No visa, no work permit,
> instant  
> deportation. It didn’t. Now France and Holland are
> on the edge.  
> Amsterdam could be the next Paris. England, once a
> delightful land of  
> safety and civility, becomes in parts a North
> African slum. I have no  
> sympathy. They made the choice. But why did they do
> it?
> 
> For that matter, if Washington wanted to end the
> illegal immigration  
> of Latinos, it could do so in a paragraph: Establish
> a fine of five  
> thousand dollars a day for employing illegals or
> renting them  
> accommodations, half of it to go to the person
> turning the offender  
> in; require proof of citizenship for welfare in any
> form, or use of  
> the schools; allow police to demand a green card at
> their discretion;  
> put the army along the border with orders to shoot.
> It won’t happen,  
> of course. I don’t care, but let’s not be surprised
> at the consequences.
> 
> What the French need to do, but won’t, is to send
> the army into the  
> Islamic slums, round up the whole lot, and put them
> ashore on the  
> beaches of North Africa with a box lunch and a
> coupon 
=== message truncated ===



        
                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to