I think you know where I stand on things.
And Christ, I think everyone here knows how I feel about Share.
Only the guilty need defend themselves Richard.
Lovin' ya like a brother. (-:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote :
On 8/31/2014 9:07 AM, steve.sundur@... <mailto:steve.sundur@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Fuck you Richard, and the horse you rode in on.
>
That's the spirit, Steve!
Now, did you get the reaction you wanted?
Share doesn't post "meaningless drivel", and I've never implied
as much.
>
So, you meant to say that you are NOT a fan of DE, and so you
replied with some "meaningless drivel." Go figure.
>
If I said something cryptic, that was misunderstood to imply
that, then I apologize to Share.
>
So, what did you think of Denise's post about Share?
If someone wants to attack Share, that's there business. If I
feel the need to say something, I will.
Unlike your main thesis, that silence implies consent, I don't
see it that way.
>
When someone attacks your friend, most people will speak up in
their defense, but not all people will do this - some people are
very prone to peer pressure, and so they just seem to agree, and
remain silent, and just go along with the attacks. But, what do
you say to someone later when they say, "Why didn't you defend me
when I got attacked?"
>
BTW, I do enjoy your contributions.
>
Thanks.
>
On 8/30/2014 12:38 PM, dmevans365@... mailto:dmevans365@...
[FairfieldLife]
wrote:
Yep. Interesting what has happened. The limits were removed. Almost
immediately, Richard and Share ushered the forum into its
evolution as a chat
room - characterized as all are by a preponderence of meaningless
drivel. Gone
are the limits telling the brain to put some thought into a post,
put some
thought into topics, put some thought into with who and in what
format one
wanted to converse. Limits that forced a pause in the action.
Quite the
statement this forum is, really. *
>
>
*
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <punditster@...>
<mailto:punditster@...> wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <steve.sundur@...>
<mailto:steve.sundur@...>wrote :
I own up to being a member of the DE fan club.
>
On 8/31/2014 8:34 AM, awoelflebater@...
<mailto:awoelflebater@...> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>
Cool, me too. But then Steve, you were always a soft-ee for
the women here.
>
So, what is so cool about Denise attacking Share? Apparently
you don't like Share, but why would it be cool to just
suddenly appear on the forum, for no good reason, and attack
Share for posting "meaningless drivel?" What's wrong with
posting meaningless drivel - other informants do it all the
time. Why can't Share and Dan have fun posting to FFL without
Denise butting in?
