On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
[FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
>
> Ann, I actually like both wayback and Edg. The difference was Steve wrote
> one negative sentence whereas Edg wrote two long and very negative posts
> attacking Richard. And the first post seemed to be triggered by a
> difference of political opinions!
>
>
This character attacked me for no apparent reason other than the fact that
I voted for George W. Bush and supported the U.S. Congress when it voted to
use military force to unseat Saddham Hussien in Iraq.

He obviously hates George W. Bush and is prejudiced against Texans, not
even realizing that GWB was born in New Haven, Connecticut. This same
character then voted for Barack Obama, who currently continues to follow
the Bush doctrine and the continuing war in Iraq against the terrorist
killers. Barack Obama is bombing the shit out of Iraq!

There have been 773,335 abortions in the U.S. so far this year and not once
has this guy piped up with a message in opposition. His enemy is not the
ISIS killers or the killing of children - his enemy is "willytex." Go
figure.

Apparently nobody posting here cares about the important issues, Share.
>

>
>
>   On Sunday, September 14, 2014 8:41 PM, "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
> [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :
>
> Ann, I think wayback was remiss in criticizing Steve and yet giving Edg a
> free pass against Richard. OTOH, I admire her for expressing an unpopular
> opinion.
>
> Her opinion is not necessarily unpopular. I had a problem with it as it
> seemed arbitrary and forced. You like Steve so you seemed to have a problem
> with it. Richard has been the brunt of Edg's acid writing style so he had a
> problem with it and Steve disagreed with Susan't assessment that it was so
> terrible 'cause he had his own reasons for saying it. For all we know
> everyone else agreed with Susan or didn't care enough to comment. So, I
> don't give her impulse to make the comment much credit although everyone
> deserves a voice here if they so choose. My beef is still the inconsistent
> standard for "nasty" and "inappropriate".
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    
>

Reply via email to