Except, as we've heard here many a time, it really wasn't his
commentary. He just approved but gave no credit to the scholar who
wrote it.
So it goes in the big business of cults.
On 09/17/2014 03:19 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
I wasn't there, with Shiva, or Parvati, during that discussion, and I
just wouldn't take an interpretation, on face value, from a third
party. I liked MMY's commentary - but I admit not having read any
appreciable amount of it, in years. Perhaps I will pick it up again.
PS Anyone can write a commentary. Whether or not people consider it
authoritative, is a personal matter, and not given to supposed edicts,
from you, or anyone else.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :
Who is limiting their horizon, here?
For decades I thought Mahesh Yogi's commentary was the be all and end
all of Bhagavad Gita commentaries.
Why?
Because the movement said so.
Ignorance is Bliss.
Lord Shiva's discourse to Goddess Parvati..."Sri Guru Gita" explains
who is qualified and who is not.
It is clear from this scripture where Mahesh Yogi stood.
