On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> > > I have seen a couple posts that alluded to this - but I don't know any > details, who is it that actually wrote the commentary and why did he or she > do it? > > *If you had been keeping up with the conversation you would already know that Judy blew to bits the theory that somebody else wrote CBG. Go figure.* > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]" < > FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:55 PM > *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why MMY's Bhagavad Gita will never be > a classic. > > > Except, as we've heard here many a time, it really wasn't his > commentary. He just approved but gave no credit to the scholar who wrote > it. > > So it goes in the big business of cults. > > On 09/17/2014 03:19 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] > wrote: > > > > I wasn't there, with Shiva, or Parvati, during that discussion, and I just > wouldn't take an interpretation, on face value, from a third party. I liked > MMY's commentary - but I admit not having read any appreciable amount of > it, in years. Perhaps I will pick it up again. PS Anyone can write a > commentary. Whether or not people consider it authoritative, is a personal > matter, and not given to supposed edicts, from you, or anyone else. > > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : > > Who is limiting their horizon, here? > For decades I thought Mahesh Yogi's commentary was the be all and end all > of Bhagavad Gita commentaries. > Why? > Because the movement said so. > Ignorance is Bliss. > > Lord Shiva's discourse to Goddess Parvati..."Sri Guru Gita" explains who > is qualified and who is not. > > It is clear from this scripture where Mahesh Yogi stood. > > > > > >
