---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jedi_spock@...> wrote :
The 'public space' needs to be protected from the onslaught of the Liberals. The 'private space' needs to be protected from the onslaught of the Conservatives. It's a paradox. In other words, you need two distinct set of laws to deal with issues of 'public space' and 'private space'. Coming to the issue of hyper-sexualisation of girls, it prevents them from having a normal healthy childhood, the previous generations had. This kind of crass commercialism and consumerism can be prevented if you tax consumption, instead of income. 'progressive consumption tax' forces people to consume less resources, purchase less goods, and put their money in banks. The issue of Public Space and Private Space has been treated be creating laws around "The Commons" to be the purview of Government Distorted Capitalism and Captured Government have distorted this. The Commons are now looted by the Owners of Government. Also, don't put your money in Banks. I was a Banker for 30 years. The Fix is in. > > --- <fleetwood_macncheese@...> wrote : > > It is demonic. Done for the money. The earlier children can be sexualized, > > opens up more marketing possibilities, legal and not. We will debase > > ourselves completely, as a culture, if it means a buck can be made. > --- <awoelflebater@...> wrote : > I was at a trade show one year down in Florida and in the hotel there > happened to be a beauty pageant for young girls. I was astounded. The time > and energy put into making very young children look like they were > prostitutes was really creepy. The mothers are all bustling about with > suitcases of costume changes and these little made up dolls (their > daughters) with big. lacquered hair and blingy outfits were a sight to > behold. Madness. > > > --- <sharelong60@...> wrote : > > > Bhairitu, I never minded about beauty pageants. Until I heard about the > > > pageants for VERY young girls. Who wore make up and high heels. > > > Something about that seems very icky to me.
