I think he's driving down the road and seeing the big "seven-oh" sign coming up and realizing that he can barely do 55 any more and 70 might be a stretch. That, of course, is all in his mind but many of my fellow boomers are becoming terrified as their peers are keeling over dead even with no prior major diseases. Myself I could care less whether I keel over tomorrow or when I'm 92 or 302. Tomorrow though might be more a problem for my relatives though. ;-)

On 05/30/2015 12:06 PM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote:

Ha! Hilarious.


Bhairitu gave the correct answer, but because Barry has turned into his own type of fundamentalist, it is beyond his comprehension.

BUT, he got to play the card he wanted to play, which is what this was all about.

Show of hands?

Who didn't know what Barry's entreaty was leading up to?

Right.  Almost no one.

TPR, folks. TPR.


---In [email protected], <turquoiseb@...> wrote :

*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]> On 05/30/2015 06:45 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... <mailto:turquoiseb@...> [FairfieldLife] wrote:

    */Since no one really responded to the issue I brought up in the
    post titled "I think former TM teachers fear the C word because
    of the D word," I'll try to put it a different way, in hopes that
    one of you will be able to explain things to me and to others
    reading this forum.
    /*
    */
    /*
    */See, here's the issue as I see it. Many of you TM teachers (or
    former TM teachers) don't seem to like being referred to as
    cultists, but you ACTED like cultists for many years, LYING to
    literally every person you instructed. In the intro lectures you
    gave to these people, you parroted what you had been told to say
    if the subject of religion came up -- "TM is NOT a religion."
    /*
    */
    /*
    */What I'm wondering is HOW you could have said this when before
    you instruct someone in TM, you have to perform a puja. You chant
    the puja in Sanskrit, but you were clearly instructed on your TM
    Teacher Training Course to "hold the English meaning of the words
    lively in your mind" as you chanted the Sanskrit words. You were
    even *tested* on your ability to do this before you became a
    teacher.
    /*
    */
    /*
    */So here's the thing...here you are in the puja room, chanting
    in Sanskrit but with the following English-language meaning
    "lively in your mind" the whole time:/*

    *To Lord Narayana, to lotus-born Brahma the Creator, to Vasishtha, to 
SHAKTI and his son, Parashara, to Vyasa, to Shukadeva, to the great GaudaPada, 
to Govinda, ruler among yogis, from him to his disciple, Shri Shankaracharya, 
from him to his disciples, Padma Pada and Hastamalaka, to him, Trotakacharya 
and Vartika-Kara, to others, to the eternal tradition of our abode of the 
wisdom of the Shrutis, Smritis and Purana, to the abode of compassion, to the 
personified glory of the Lord, to Shankara, emancipator of the world, I bow 
down.

    To Shankaracharya, the Emancipator, adored as Krishna and Badarayana, to 
the two authors of the commentary on the Brahma Sutras, I bow down To both 
expressions of the Divine, in Shankara, I bow down again and again At whose 
door the whole galaxy of gods pray for perfection day and night Adorned with 
immeasurable glory, preceptor of the whole world, having bowed to Him we gain 
complete fulfillment.*

    */So what's up with this?/*
    */
    /*
    */I mean, you were chanting words you *clearly knew the meaning
    of*, saying that you were *bowing down* to quite a few Hindu
    deities, who were either mentioned by name or by their common
    nicknames. You had all of this bowing down to Hindu deities
    "lively in your mind" every time you instructed someone.
    /*
    */
    /*
    */And yet the next time you gave a TM intro lecture, you looked
    straight into the eyes of the people who asked you "Is TM
    religious?" and you told them "No. Absolutely not. No way TM is
    religious."
    /*
    */
    /*
    */Do you see my problem with this?/*
    */
    /*
    */You KNEW that you were bowing down to Hindu gods. It was
    "lively in your mind" during every puja. And yet in pretty much
    *every* intro lecture you ever gave you said that TM was not in
    any way religious.
    /*
    */
    /*
    */Please explain this to me.
    /*
    */
    /*
    */How can a rational person NOT consider you a cultist for doing
    this?/*


    Because pujas like mantras are a device.  The dieties are
    symbolic. You are setting things up for a form of energy
    transferral (shaktipat).  If you want to look upon those names of
    "Hindu gods" as some kind of living beings then you are looking at
    this like a fundamentalist.

    */
    /*
    */Thanks for replying. I'm always interested in the justifications
    people come up with for being a cultist, rather than just saying,
    "Hey, I was a cultist." With all due respect, your reply indicates
    that you still are. /*




Reply via email to