So, it's all about Richard. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 You've made a strawman argument, Xeno. Jim's point, which you have not 
addressed, was explicit:
 

 "The [Yahoo] guidelines are not arbitrary. They are put in place to foster 
discussion, about anything. If you and Rick decide hands off, there is no 
unambiguous solution to trolling on this forum."
 

 This isn't about Yahoo "enforcing" its guidelines, much less about the recent 
Supreme Court case (which wasn't actually about "free speech"), or any legal 
issue, for that matter. Nor is it about what may happen on other groups.
 

 Trolling isn't illegal, but permitting it degrades the quality of discussion, 
whether it's by Richard's flooding the forum with idiotic prattle or Barry 
"pushing buttons" specifically to incite angry reactions.
 

 So, why can't I post idiotic prattle? It's not fair. LoL!

 

 Plus which, as Jim has gone on to point out to you, the group setting "not 
moderated" refers to approving or disapproving messages before they're posted. 
There is indeed moderation after the fact on FFL in certain very specific 
situations, as Alex noted (he left out breach of privacy, e.g., outing the real 
name of a person who wishes to remain anonymous). It's a question of *how much* 
moderation takes place and on what basis.
 

 This group lost a significant segment of its regular participants due to 
unrestrained malicious trolling. They represented a general perspective of 
which the group is now largely deprived. There's a real sense in which a group 
does not qualify as a "free speech zone" if those members taking one side of an 
argument are treated so badly by the other side that they no longer want to 
participate.
 

 Now this is ironic - I've probably been treated as badly as anyone subscribing 
to this group. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <anartaxius@...> wrote :

 It is for Yahoo to enforce guidelines, not Rick. According to the Fairfield 
Life home page, it says specifically in the group settings that 'messages are 
not moderated'. The choice to moderate content or not is left to the group 
administrator, and this is a choice Rick has made according to the way Yahoo 
set up the site. So Alex's job description here does not include moderating the 
content of the messages either. Yahoo made the guidelines and it is their 
responsibility if there is a responsibility here, since they also made the 
option to not moderate content available to the group administrator. The 
question to ask is why are you still here complaining about it? Your complaints 
are directed to the wrong people. Yahoo in fact might have far less leeway in 
enforcing guidelines after the recent supreme court decision concerning on-line 
free speech. You have your own content-moderated group by choice, so what is 
drawing you to a place you clearly SAY you do not like? This is insane 
behaviour. 

 You have obviously not looked at some of the other so-called 'spiritual' 
groups on Yahoo and other places where similar ideological battles take place. 
Some get overrun with spam. Quite a lot simply die from lack of interest. Quite 
a lot of them hide messages from non-members so you cannot see what it is 
really about without joining. Some are moderated by their administrators, and 
some are not.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <reverse_archery@...> wrote :

 Alex, before you and Rick sprain your wrists patting yourselves on the back 
for creating a "free speech zone", you must be aware that, contrary to the 
thousands of forums on Yahoo Groups, yours is not in compliance with the 
guidelines. Nothing to be proud of.  

 The guidelines are not arbitrary. They are put in place to foster discussion, 
about anything. If you and Rick decide hands off, there is no unambiguous 
solution to trolling on this forum. That is why the majority of the forums, 
mine included, adhere to the guidelines set out by Yahoo Groups. Rick's and 
yours don't, and that is no occasion for congratulations.  
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote :

 Thanks. From the very start, FFL was intended as a free speech zone. When Rick 
asked me to be a moderator, the job description was to handle subscriptions, 
keep out spammers, and make sure there's no porn or other content that would 
get FFL categorized as an adult group, where it would be much less visible on 
the 'net. For a time, I was also tasked with enforcing the moronic posting 
limit.
 
WRT colloidal silver, I would only add that it should not be taken on a regular 
basis, and even at 20 PPM, no more than 6oz should be taken per day.

 
















 

Reply via email to