The NY Times put a spin on that by saying "Democrats voted to kill assistance to workers displaced by global trade" thus trying to make the Democrats look bad. But these bills are far worse than that. This was just one of several trade bills that need to be quashed.

On 06/12/2015 02:18 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
"In a remarkable rejection of a president they have resolutely backed, House Democrats voted to kill assistance to workers displaced by global trade, a program their party created and has stood by for four decades. By doing so, they brought down legislation granting the president trade promotion authority — the power to negotiate trade deals that cannot be amended or filibustered by Congress — before it could even come to a final vote."

from the NY Times

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Friday, June 12, 2015 3:17 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Obama backed trade bill fails

What was in the trade bill/bills that was upsetting so many people? I know it's been freaking people out for a while but never investigated to see what was up. I figured we're doomed anyway, LOL.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, June 12, 2015 1:15 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Obama backed trade bill fails

Yay! Score one for the people. The House was able to defray the the
descent into tyranny.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/president-obama-is-all-in-on-trade-sees-it-as-a-cornerstone-of-his-legacy/2015/06/12/32b6dce8-1073-11e5-a0dc-2b6f404ff5cf_story.html






Reply via email to