Xeno, A few weeks ago, I posted an article about the new developments in physics discussed at a conference in Puerto Rico. Apparently, some physicists are raising the issue that information is more fundamental than matter and energy. That means Hawking, Krauss and Dawkins are wrong in their interpretation of the Big Bang.
Information can be interpreted as consciousness that springs forth from the unified field. As such, this information is the observer, the process of observing, and the observed. This is the dynamic relationship that creates the infinite universes which includes our own. As a product of the unified field, our universe is a reflection of its creator. Our earth and everything in it are part of this universe and the quantum wave function which made this all happen. MMY stated that this wave function can be accessed while in transcendental consciousness or samadhi. Dr. John Hagelin stated in one of internet videos that the expansion of the universe is powered by dark energy, the emptiness of space, i.e. the unified field itself. Other scientists, like Dr. Leonard Susskind, are proposing that the beginning and end of the universe can be compared to information stored in a hologram which can be expressed in scientific formulas. But this idea lacks the lively intelligence of the information expressed in MMY's samhita of the Rishi-Devata-Chandas. You may disagree with this idea from MMY, but the new concept, that information is more fundamental than matter and energy, is somewhat similar to the thoughts that MMY formulated many years ago. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <anartaxius@...> wrote : From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 7:41 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Why Does Time Exist? Sean Carroll, a physicist, discusses the various aspects of time but does not cover the various theories of the Big Bang. He did not talk about the unified field or the quantum wave function which was the source of the Big Bang. IMO, the fact that the universe is expanding to eternity means that the universe came out of eternity, through the quantum wave function. In the Big Bang theory, if space were negatively curved, the universe would expand, as a measure of time, eternally, but that does not say anything about where it came from or what it came from, or in fact if it came at all. The beginning, as a function of quantum mechanical ideas might be a quantum fluctuation, but did any quantum field exist before the universe began. But before it began, or even at the beginning there would be no quantum wave function, which requires there be particles, but no particles exist in that highly compressed state at the Big Bang. A wave function in quantum mechanics describes the quantum state of an isolated system of one or more particles. Exactly what does 'coming out of eternity' mean in your scenario. Is the eternity the universe comes out of time based? Because without space-time, there is no time. Whereas the universe expanding to eternity takes, in terms of time, forever, and that is time-based. Sean Carroll: Why Does Time Exist? http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=415003106 http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=415003106 Sean Carroll: Why Does Time Exist? http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=415003106 Cosmologist Sean Carroll tackles a deceptively simple question: Why does time exist at all? The potential answers point to a surprising view of the nature o... View on www.npr.org http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=415003106 Preview by Yahoo
