--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" > > > [...] > > > > > From what Rick has said, a large portion of MMY's secretaries > not > > > > > only have had sex with him but have mentioned it to him or > have > > > > > publicised it in some way. > > > > > > > > Is this some obsure form of humor? Being that virtually all of > MMY's > > > > secretaries have been male. Are you suggesting that MMY has has > > > > numerous homosexual relations? How bizzare that this is how you > > > > interpret what rick has said -- a number of times. Or as I > asked, it > > > > some obsure form of humor I am missing? > > > > > > OK, from what Rick has said, a large portion of MMY's *female* > > > secretaries have had sex with MMY, and Rick has found out about > this > > > because they either told him personally, or let it be publicized > in > > > some other way. > > > > He had no female secretaries. That is the point. So you are > obscurely > > making the point that he did not have sex? > > > > That you "heard" Rick say that M had sex with female secretaries > says > > alot about your cognitive processes -- and perhaps explains why you > > have been skeptical of it all. You are so out of touch with the > > reported "facts" and strange imangined loops are interceeding. > > > > Various male secretaries, aka skin boys, escorted various woman to > his > > room at wee hours, at various times and locations, and they emerged > > disheaveled hours later. And some of the women confined in some of > the > > male secretaries months later, continents away, about what happened. > > > > OK, my bad. I assumed that there was some kind of professional > relationship going on. If MMY was just asking for a specific woman to > be brought to his door, for whatever reason, who didn't have a direct > boss/underling relationship with him, then its all pretty silly to > get upset about. IMHO.
Well, for everyone there was some sort of teacher / student relationship. So exploitation of that is not out of the question. But no one was on salarly, other than room and board and a stipend. It was not like a corporate setting where M was directly hiring a secretary or some female marketing director and then hitting on them. But he controlled who was in the inner circles -- thus in a sense had full hiring and firing responsibilities. And sleeping with "direct reports" is a no no in the corporate world. And dangerous because it opens the company up for massive sexual discrimination suits. (He/CEO didn't promote me, he didnt give me the raise i deserved, etc, because I would't sleep with him anymore". Its become a firable offense for top executives -- and for most managment levels. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
