You're a little confused. See my third paragraph below. All three of 'em are doing it.
(I'm not talking about *sexual* harassment, BTW, just continued annoying dumb attacks, typically gratuitous.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : I think she was accusing anartaxius of harassing her not you, or maybe I am confused From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Time to come clean Doug ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : You are a bit over the top in your reaction I think J, I don't think he's harassing you, but that would be in the mind of the receiver of the comments wouldn't it? Anartax certainly can't be accused of harassing TM'ers. He is pretty balanced in most of his posts actually. No. I'm not harassing anyone, I'm just calling them out on their hypocrisy. You can't expect to launch a sneering pile-on and not get other people objecting if they like the work of the poster. Me harassing TMers would also be silly as I am one. I do like analysing the cult of TM though, maybe that's what she means, but I never lose sleep over that as the TM movement claims to be scientific and science actually proceeds by criticism. If an idea is a bad explanation it won't stand up to scrutiny and should be discarded. Easy to forget that. And it is what this place is for. A healthy mind challenges its own assumptions etc... From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 11:40 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Time to come clean Doug I do not say this. But sometimes it's obvious what state of mind a poster is in. salyavin was just demanding that Ann quit what he called her "dumb harassment of Xeno." How about you quit your dumb harassment of me and other TM supporters? Or is the idea to make up for Barry's absence by emulating his harassing behavior? You, salyavin, and Curtis seem to be working pretty hard at it, if not very coherently. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <anartaxius@...> wrote : Ah. The master projector oracle speaks. I know, she says, exactly what everyone is really thinking and why. From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:00 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Time to come clean Doug ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : I would certainly have to agree with you, xeno. The question is how, or why do you respond to someone who, for a great majority of the time, is just going for a reaction. It is a total waste of time, for which I am guilty. I agree that Barry was likely never upset when he posted. I beg to differ with both of you. He was often incoherent with rage and completely out of control when he posted after someone had dissected one of his posts. You could count on it: he would very rarely respond directly to criticism, but a day or so later, he'd come out with one of his long posts attacking the critic on whatever grounds he could dream up. All his bluster about folks being attached to the self was projection; he was as attached as anybody and much more attached than some.
