Did you fall asleep, s3raphita? I plead guilty! I blanked that sentence out.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : If you read my post, you will see that I mention, in the very next sentence after the one you quote. the example of Edward VIII. Did you fall asleep, s3raphita? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote : Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a position that you can retire from. ": What about Edward VIII's abdication (1936) - after his involvement with that woman Wallis Simpson? "Not a position that you can retire from" is what they said about popes, until Benedict XVI threw in the towel. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : I think it's long been an open secret that Prince William rather than Prince Charles will succeed to the throne. I don't think Charles wants to be king, and it would be much more exciting for everyone involved to have a younger man. Charles is already 67 or 68, I believe. But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a position that you can retire from. No one except Edward VIII in 1936 has done it—and for an American divorcee, of all people! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote : She looks fairly healthy for a woman in her 90s. She could outlive Prince Charles with her longevity and deny him the kingship. And would Prince William get the crown instead if she decides to retire? http://news.yahoo.com/queen-elizabeth-ii-set-become-longest-reigning-uk-071442845.html http://news.yahoo.com/queen-elizabeth-ii-set-become-longest-reigning-uk-071442845.html
