Well, taken at face value, the implication is, "I am not influenced by big money pouring into my campaign, but the same can't be said for my opponents"
In other words, a rather elitist proclamation. Actually, I think everyone, (speaking of commentators, and those watching them) had a grand time discussing the debate points and replaying the comments of those two old timers slugging it out, making references to people and events 50, 60 years ago! I believe the consensus was, that Hillary carried the day. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : I imagine she'd expect you to answer that for yourself (if you even really needed to ask the question): She's not the only one receiving big money. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : Hillary says we've got to get the big money out of politics. But then says, the big money that contributes to her political campaign have no influence. So, why go after the big money in politics? Hillary?
