Ahhh...of course DT only hires the *best* and since DT knows what is *best*, it makes sense that he'd hire a "mini-me."
I think I'm with you - he's not worth spending any more energy on. I was so completely bored by DT's performance, it's hard to think that the large majority of people watching wouldn't be able to see that his depth doesn't run any deeper than "blow....hard." I do fail to see the appeal on any level. He got a fair number of "boo's"; the audience was tired of him as well. And the questions sent his way were also absurdly ridiculous. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : I found this to be an interesting article. The man behind Trump's run http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/man-behind-donald-trump-run-lewandowski-120443 http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/man-behind-donald-trump-run-lewandowski-120443 The man behind Trump's run http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/man-behind-donald-trump-run-lewandowski-120443 The highly paid, PR-savvy “bomb thrower” managing Donald’s campaign is a lot like his new boss. View on www.politico.com http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/man-behind-donald-trump-run-lewandowski-120443 Preview by Yahoo ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : sent a moment too soon. I am just not sure if DT is worthy of immense attention given to him by some here. But, I could be mistaken. (that's it, in a nutshell) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote : I could very well be under reacting. I told my wife after the very first debate, that he was "through" Imagine my surprise when I woke up the next morning and see that he had won. It is just hard for me to see anything other than a lot of stalemate on domestic issues, non starters on foreign trade, as other countries can impose their own new rules. The real bottom line for me (as I've said before) is what military actions he would decide to take, and the fact that Russia has nuclear weapons, an economy in shambles, and a leader who bent on pushing Russian influence by most any means. So, maybe I am under reacting. I am behind the curve on many issues. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emily.mae50@...> wrote : Re: "I am thinking there might be a tad of overreaction on the part of you and Ann.." Methinks not Steve. Curiously, in your mind, what visual comes to mind when you think of me "overreacting?" You are perhaps under-reacting. Can you even imagine the Trumpster meeting with.....lets say......ANY country? I'll let you, with your sense of humor, determine if such a script might be worth developing here on FFL.
