The terrorists are already here, entrenched with numerous positions in banking, 
industry and government. Hint, hint, it ain't the syrians, arabs, iranians, 
iraqis, or any other Muslims. All you xenophobes are terrified by outside 
influences while the second largest terrorist attack on US soil was caused by 
an ex-military white guy. I'll say it again, "An ex-military white guy". Who 
vetted *that* guy?? 

 Speaking of who comes and who goes, perhaps those moronic radical preachers 
telling their flocks that TM and its peaceful influence is demonic ought to 
think about their negative influence on this country and GTFO. The only thing 
'born again' about those yokels is their ego. They probably get reborn as North 
Koreans anyway. lol
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 
 It doesn't matter how intense something is if it is incomplete!
 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 11:08 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Pope - Again
 
 
   Mike, please read this article.  Here is some of it.  REALITY CHECK, MIKE, 
REALITY CHECK COMING YOUR WAY!  Have a good week.  I recommend the book "The 
Middle Way" by Thich Nhat Hanh for you.  And, no, the Middle Way doesn't mean 
taking a position in the "middle."  
 "Every refugee goes through an intensive vetting process, but the precautions 
are increased for Syrians. Multiple law enforcement, intelligence and security 
agencies perform “the most rigorous screening of any traveler to the U.S.,” 
says a senior administration official. Among the agencies involved are the 
State Department, the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center, the Department of 
Defense and the Department of Homeland Security. A DHS officer conducts 
in-person interviews with every applicant. Biometric information such as 
fingerprints are collected and matched against criminal databases. Biographical 
information such as past visa applications are scrutinized to ensure the 
applicant’s story coheres.
 What percentage of applicants “pass” the screening process?
 Just over 50%.
 How long does the whole process take? 
 Eighteen to 24 months on average.
 How many have been resettled here? 
 About 1,800 over the past year. They’ve been placed in dozens of states across 
the country, but most are in big states with large immigrant populations, such 
as California, Texas, Illinois and Michigan.
 Who are they?
 According to a senior administration official, roughly half the refugees 
admitted have been children. Around 25% are adults over 60. Only 2% of those 
admitted, the senior administration official said, have been single males of 
“combat age.”
 This Is How the Syrian Refugee Screening Process Works 
http://time.com/4116619/syrian-refugees-screening-process/ 
 
 http://time.com/4116619/syrian-refugees-screening-process/
 
 This Is How the Syrian Refugee Screening Proces... 
http://time.com/4116619/syrian-refugees-screening-process/ It takes 18 to 24 
months.


 
 View on time.com http://time.com/4116619/syrian-refugees-screening-process/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Emily, are you not understanding that the FBI has said that they can not 
properly vet these refugees?
 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 11:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Pope - Again

 
   Did I say I wanted open borders?  No, I didn't.  Did I say I wanted to 
exclude whole populations?  No I didn't  
 

 By the way, the bill for potential "refugees" is considering refugees from all 
over the world, not just Syria.  
 

 How many refugees does the United States admit? Each year the President, in 
consultation with Congress, determines the numerical ceiling for refugee 
admissions. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2016, the proposed ceiling is 85,000 
http://www.state.gov/j/prm/releases/docsforcongress/247770.htm. 
 Refugee Ceilings and Admitted Refugees to the United States, FY 2009-2015
 
(Source: Refugee Processing Center 
http://www.wrapsnet.org/Reports/AdmissionsArrivals)


 Over one-third of all refugee arrivals (35.1 percent 
http://www.wrapsnet.org/Reports/AdmissionsArrivals, or 24,579) in FY 2015 came 
from the Near East/South Asia—a region that includes Iraq, Iran, Bhutan, and 
Afghanistan.  Another third of all refugee arrivals (32.1 percent, or 22,472) 
in FY 2015 came from Africa. Over a quarter of all refugee arrivals (26.4 
percent, or 18,469) in FY 2015 came from East Asia — a region that includes 
China, Vietnam, and Indonesia. 

 Are you not understanding that the majority of Syrian refugees applying are 
women and children?  Are you not understanding that it is a vetting process 
that takes up to TWO YEARS as currently structured?  
 

 Mike, these are the facts!  What are you making up in your head?  
 

 Yes, ISIS is a terrorist group and they are engaging in terrorist activities 
and it's a real bummer for everyone.  I am sure that we will do our best as a 
nation to keep terrorists out.  As we are doing currently.  
 

 Honestly, Mike, I believe strongly we need to take stock of our domestic 
situation.  My priorities are different though.  Building a wall for billions 
and billions of dollars is not even on the list.  
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 The latest Omnibus spending bill has funding for up to 300,000 refugees over 
the next few years. Doesn't mean there will be that many but the potential is 
there.The FBI has said there is no way to thoroughly  vet these refugees. There 
are no public records available on them. All public records in Syria have been 
destroyed due to the war. ISIS also captured a passport office in Syria and has 
thousands of blank Passports. ISIS has openly threatened to send their people 
here as they have done in Europe. There is no point in admitting people here if 
we don't know who they are and the FBI has admitted there is no way to really 
know who each refugee is.

 As for a wall, so you want open borders. Let Mexico and central America send 
anyone and everyone( you did say whole populations, didn't you) they want with 
no restraints. WTF wouldn't come?Why not several hundred million Indians and 
Chinese?With populations in the billions, they wouldn't miss a few. I bet they 
need jobs and just want to improve their lives also. Why even bother to make 
them come here to improve their lives? Why not just tax the hell out of 
everybody here and send the money to people in their native countries where the 
dollars will go further? Better yet, if you want to be *enriched* by their 
cultures , why don't you just go live with them.
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 9:53 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Pope - Again

 
   You and I support the same thing theoretically; I support a *controlled* 
entry and exit of foreigners also.  Absolutely.  SO DOES THE UNITED STATES.  
It's why I carry a passport when I travel; other countries do too.  
 

 We can't be the world's safety net and we aren't, with respect to the Syrian 
refugees.  Remember that Obama, whom you despise doesn't think we should be the 
world's policeman either and has been working to build coalitions from the get 
go in the Middle East.  
 

 This what is so funny to me.  LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, MIKE (It's in the fact 
sheet I posted to you) and try and convince me there are hundreds of thousands 
of Syrian refugees, every one a potential terrorist, invading our borders 
unfairly. The majority are staying in the Middle East, first of all.  
 

 "A total of 2,290 Syrian refugees have arrived in the United States since 
fiscal year 2011, which is when the Syrian civil war began 
https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL33487.pdf, through Nov. 20, according to 
the State Department’s Refugee Processing Center 
http://www.wrapsnet.org/Reports/InteractiveReporting/tabid/393/EnumType/Report/Default.aspx?ItemPath=/rpt_WebArrivalsReports/MX%20-%20Arrivals%20by%20Nationality%20and%20Religion.
 

 

 “It’s very important for people to know there’s a big, big difference between 
the relative chaotic scene we’ve seen played out in Europe and the resettlement 
process in the United States,” Boian said."

 

 "The way it works is that after the State Department has approved a refugee 
for resettlement in the U.S. — a process 
http://www.rcusa.org/uploads/pdfs/Refugee%20resettlement%20-%20step%20by%20step%20USCRI.pdf
 that can take up to two years — the refugee is referred to one of nine 
domestic resettlement agencies 
http://www.state.gov/j/prm/ra/receptionplacement/index.htm, each with a network 
of affiliates fanned across the country.
 It is those resettlement agencies — which gather weekly — that make decisions 
about where to place new, incoming refugees.
 The chief consideration is whether the refugee has family ties in the United 
States, said Matthew Soerens, a spokesman for World Relief, one of the nine 
resettlement agencies 
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/orr/resource/voluntary-agencies. If a refugee 
does, every effort is made to place that person near relatives. That is why, he 
said, larger numbers of Syrian refugees are placed in Michigan, Illinois, 
Pennsylvania and California, where there are small pockets of Syrian Americans.
 Absent family ties in the U.S., Soerens said, the agencies try to relocate 
people where there are available jobs. Each of the nine resettlement agencies 
works with its network of affiliates spread across the country. In the case of 
World Relief, an evangelical organization, that network is often through 
evangelical church organizations."

 

 I also believe in the need to integrate refugees into our society and I think 
we have a responsibility to assist.  I also know that employing extremist 
measures (e.g., building a wall or refusing entry to whole populations) is 
nothing less than the product of fear and completely irrational.  

 

 What we need for all our citizens and those immigrating both are education, 
affordable housing and living wages, I agree.  Living off of welfare benefits 
is virtually impossible and I'm guessing very, very, few people have that 
intention or even know enough to know how to attempt it.  It's comical.  One 
will spend years in shelters before one gets federal, subsidized, housing here, 
which is still pro-rated for income.  Food benefits are less than $200/month 
here per individual and require a half-time job. Just try to get a specialized 
doctor to accept the medicaid version of Obamacare.  Did you ever try to live 
on minimum wage?  I did.  Thank God education was cheaper back then and I 
didn't end up starting off with $30,000 in debt, like kids are now.  
 

 You really are an "us and them" kind of a guy.  And "they" are the enemy.  
Ever meditate with the Quakers?  Might be a good experience to hook up with a 
different crowd and practice changing your perceptions.  Change is the only 
constant, after all.  Staying stuck in your views will only bring you pain and 
suffering and rage and anger and intolerance and impatience and greed and etc.  
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Yes Emily, we live in totally different worlds.You, in how you think it should 
be and me, how it actually functions. I support a *controlled* entry and exit 
of foreigners. We have to know *who* is coming in and what their intentions 
are. And we can't be the world's safety net. There are literally hundreds of 
millions of people in the world that would love to come here and suck off the 
big tit of the American government and maybe try to make it if they can. At 
what point do YOU say *enough*! 

 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 4:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Pope - Again

 
   We live in two different worlds, Mike.  I don't envy you yours.  
 

 Closing our borders to________(Who? Everyone from the Middle East and 
Mexico?)___________, which seems to be what you are now promoting below, will 
not stop terrorism.   
 

 If you read the facts, the US right now is letting in very, very, few refugees 
(those fleeing from terror, let us remember) and those that are let in go 
through an arduous vetting process.  
 

 My heart aches for every suicide bombing, that I can assure you of.  
 

 "A breakaway Pakistani faction of the militant Taliban group has claimed 
responsibility for an Easter Sunday bombing in a park in the eastern city of 
Lahore that killed 65 people.
 Ahsanullah Ahsan, spokesman for Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, told the Associated Press 
that a suicide bomber with the faction deliberately targeted the Christian 
community."

 In the world of Christianity, "Christ is risen" and the faithful will ascend 
to be with Christ upon their death.  Let us hope their families can take some 
comfort in this.   

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Emily, your naivety astounds me. Numerous Somali refugees once living in 
Wisconsin  have already traveled to the middle east to join up with ISIS. You 
have the Tzarneav brothers responsible for the Boston bombings and the married 
couple in California from Pakistan and others I can't even remember. Numerous 
*refugee* from Syria and elsewhere are being caught sneaking across the 
southern border from Mexico. Nobody knows how many have not been caught or what 
their true intentions are. How many Paris or Brussels type attacks in the US do 
we have to have for you to wake up. I have no intentions of letting my country 
go the same route Europe has gone.News just broke about a suicide bombing in 
Pakistan by Taliban, killing numerous women and children, mostly Christian 
celebrating Easter. 
 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 11:37 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Pope - Again

 
   Mike, you continue to be so far off base in your statements on refugees that 
are being allowed to come here, it's incredible.  You simply never adjust your 
position to reflect the facts; you rigidly adhere to what you *think* and then 
wallow in self-righteousness, despite all evidence to the contrary.  Fascinates 
me, really, as so many, like you adopt this different perception of reality.  
Your mind seems a very frightened place.  
 

 Facts about the Syrian Refugees 
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/facts-about-the-syrian-refugees/ 
 
 http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/facts-about-the-syrian-refugees/
 
 Facts about the Syrian Refugees 
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/facts-about-the-syrian-refugees/ The Paris 
bombings and other recent terrorist attacks have given rise to a political 
debate within the United States about the Obama administration’s plan ...


 
 View on www.factcheck.org 
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/facts-about-the-syrian-refugees/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 Right, there is *intent* to play the emotions, especially when you show 
bloodied children and lifeless bodies. What's the saying... A picture is worth 
a thousand words. The the next step is that we have to bring them all here into 
our communities or we are heartless bastards. Just as you predictably pointed 
out, the excuse is, *They will enrich our communities with diversity* That's 
just pure BS! There is no way to accurately vet who is coming, what their 
intent is, how or even if, they will adapt to a foreign culture. Meanwhile, 
ISIS is infiltrating the ranks of genuine refugees, intent on doing as much 
harm as they can. Other refugees, not all mind you, who may not be terrorists 
are exactly what liberals proclaim to hate... violent, misogynistic, homophobic 
, anti -Semitic, xenophobic bastards that are convinced that they are superior 
to anyone else. But then, how many women marry a man they are attracted to for 
some reason, knowing he has many faults that she can't stand but is convinced 
that she can *change* him. Sorry Anne, bringing large numbers of foreign people 
here that can't be properly vetted, especially from cultures that have a strong 
tendency to *not* assimilate and think your culture is inferior  is a bad idea. 
It's a far better idea to put pressure on neighboring countries to absorb the 
refugees until things settle down. Western and European countries could help 
foot the bill although the oil rich countries should be able to handle it.
 

 
 


 From:</

(Message over 64 KB, truncated)













































































Reply via email to