S3, I'm glad you understand what I was saying. I believe there are some priests in the Catholic Church who think the same way. But they're afraid to rock the boat and be labelled a heretic. It will take hundreds of years for the mainline Christian churches to accept it because they think it is a form or pantheism. and does not follow the original thinking and dogma of the Church Fathers. For example, it took the Catholic Church at least 500 years to admit that it was wrong in accusing Galileo of heresy.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote : That's my take also. Though I'd expect very few church-goers would understand what we're on about. Alan Watts wrote clearly defending this same interpretation. The more correct post header should be: Jesus Christ said "I am the Unified Field" - the "I" is all of us. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote : Yes, it would appear so. There's a passage in the New Testament in which he broke the bread, during the Last Supper, and said, 'take this and eat for this is my body. Then, he raised the cup of wine and said, 'drink this for this is my blood'. He also said his body and blood are true food and he who eats and drinks them will never die. IOW, he is saying that Being or the unified field is true food and he who partakes in it will be become eternal. How can his body and blood be in the form of bread and wine? Because Being or the unified field is in everything in creation, including the bread and wine, and because it is simultaneously the basis of all creation. So, Jesus was saying He is in everyone and everything. In one stroke, Jesus explained a very complex concept to the apostles so that they can understand how the universe functions and that He is the source of it all. However, I don't believe the mainline Christians today and in the past fully understand this concept, which can be practically and scientifically understood in the way MMY explained the unified field or Being.
