Tom Huffman t...@chromapure.com [FairfieldLife]
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Friday, July 8, 2016 7:06 AM
There is no need to paraphrase or speculate about what Comey said
regarding Clinton lying to the public. He was asked explicitly about
this and his answer was "That's a question I am not qualified to
answer." When asked if she had lied to the FBI (doing so is a crime),
he said "We have no basis to conclude that she lied to the FBI." When
asked if she had lied under oath to Congress, he said that they did
not look at that because they had been given no referral by Congress
to investigate this.
To establish that she "lied" you would have to show not merely that
she made statements that were false. It is fairly clear that she did.
You would also have to establish that she KNEW that the statements
were false when she made them. So far, there has been no evidence of
this.
The most often cited example was her claim that she never sent or
received information that was classified at the time. The FBI
determined that there were 110 e-mails that contained classified
information went sent or received. However, this is out of 30,000
e-mails and of the 110 only 3 had classified markings on them and of
those 3 NONE had headers that indicated that they were classified (as
they should have had). It is perfectly possible that she was simply
mistaken when she made the claims about never sending or received
classified material. Being mistaken is not the same as lying.
authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Thursday, July 7, 2016 10:38 PM
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
LOL. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like just about the only time Judy
makes an appearance in FairflieldLife lately, is to defend Hillary.
Sorry, I don't see that as dedication to *truth* but dedication to
one person.
How about dedication to whatever happens to interest me?
Just in the past couple of days, BTW, I had an exchange with John
about the pope's suggestion that bishops and priests might make
individual exceptions to the church's rules on communion for remarried
people. I guess you missed that completely.
And as I pointed out but you ignored, I haven't been proselytizing for
Hillary.
In one earlier post, I mentioned that Comey said, in so many words,
that Hillary lied to the public, by his denying the truthfulness of
many of her previous statements to the public..
Judy counters with Gowdy asked Comey if she lied to the FBI in which
Comey said *no*. "That's pretty explicit." Inferring Hillary never
lied.. to anyone, the FBI or the public.
That may be your *inference*, but it wasn't my *implication*. (Check
Mr. Dictionary.)
Straw-man argument. Two different alligations.
Hillary lied her @$$ off to the public over the past 15 months but
*may* have told the truth to the FBI. We'll never know because she was
never under oath, nor were her questions and answers recorded to be
examined later.
*From:* "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:48 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
Duh!!!!!!!!!
Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.
Oh, you two. Judy does not strike me as a fanatical anything, let
alone a fanatical Hillary supporter. That's sloppy reasoning and
analysis and lazy to boot - it reminds me of the way Mr Wooden Clogs
used to throw accusations around like slop in a pig sty. You guys can
do better.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
*Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary
supporter?* :-D
On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:39 PM
LOL. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like just about the only time Judy
makes an appearance in FairflieldLife lately, is to defend Hillary.
Sorry, I don't see that as dedication to *truth* but dedication to
one person.
In one earlier post, I mentioned that Comey said, in so many words,
that Hillary lied to the public, by his denying the truthfulness of
many of her previous statements to the public..
Judy counters with Gowdy asked Comey if she lied to the FBI in which
Comey said *no*. "That's pretty explicit." Inferring Hillary never
lied.. to anyone, the FBI or the public.
Straw-man argument. Two different alligations.
Hillary lied her @$$ off to the public over the past 15 months but
*may* have told the truth to the FBI. We'll never know because she was
never under oath, nor were her questions and answers recorded to be
examined later.
*From:* "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:48 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
Duh!!!!!!!!!
Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.
Oh, you two. Judy does not strike me as a fanatical anything, let
alone a fanatical Hillary supporter. That's sloppy reasoning and
analysis and lazy to boot - it reminds me of the way Mr Wooden Clogs
used to throw accusations around like slop in a pig sty. You guys can
do better.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
*Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary
supporter?* :-D
On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Thursday, July 7, 2016 8:48 PM
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
Duh!!!!!!!!!
Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.
Oh, you two. Judy does not strike me as a fanatical anything, let
alone a fanatical Hillary supporter. That's sloppy reasoning and
analysis and lazy to boot - it reminds me of the way Mr Wooden Clogs
used to throw accusations around like slop in a pig sty. You guys can
do better.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
*Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary
supporter?* :-D
On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:24 AM
Duh!!!!!!!!!
Most dedicated of True Believers. Judy could be Hillary's *Bevan Morris*.
Hillary's *skin boy*. LOL
BTW, that's not meant to be *mean spirited*. In fact, a compliment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:02 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Morning Joe
*Hey Mike, you think that Judy might be a fanatical Hillary
supporter?* :-D
On 07/07/2016 06:41 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com
<mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
