I pity the poor people who expect to get good jobs if Trump is elected. He has a long history of not paying his workers and his suppliers. He's been sued umpty times, but many of the people he's cheated don't have the money to sue him, and their businesses have just gone under when he's stiffed them.
I don't imagine he'll encourage getting tough on big employers who do the same. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote : It's not about gender. It's about policy. The country doesn't want 11- 30 million illegals being granted citizenship(open borders). They don't want a half million or more poorly vetted Syrian refugees brought here. They want jobs and somebody that knows how to create jobs, somebody that actually has run a business and met a payroll . They don't like NAFTA and they don't want TPP. They want hope for the future and jobs leaving the country or being filled by illegals, doesn't inspire hope. They want law and order and don't want their police demonized. This is why people are voting for Trump and then some just hate Hillary. From: "olliesedwuz@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:44 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The case against Donald Trump Yes, that is the direct question this country faces, are we mature enough to judge a leader by their qualifications, setting aside gender? That's it, and yeah a lot of people are grasping for bizarre explanations on why Clinton should not be elected, masking some naked almost primeval fear about letting brains excel over brawn. Deep seated stuff, and it couldn't be clearer this time around. Given that bias, anyone but Trump would be destroying Clinton in the polls now, or at least making it a 50-50 race. Instead, Trump continues to lag, with the surreal consequence of the media calling it "close", on the rare occasion that Trump leads in one poll, out of the hundreds taken. I don't see Trump ever making it into office. He is just the wrong fit all the way around. I don't feel any anxiety over it either. I am long tired of his screaming jump, and the media meekly responding how high? We are smarter as a country than this goon, and that will become well apparent on election day. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : Obviously, Trump cannot win a debate against Hillary. He has neither the knowledge nor experience. But here is what will happen: Hillary will win the debate but Trump—surprise, surprise—will continue his uptick in the polls. Not by much, but it will be there. There will also be a growth in the number of "secret Trumpists," that is, people who plan to vote for Trump but will not admit it. This could give Trump a bigger margin of victory on Election Day. Ultimately, America will prefer a man to a woman. That's what it comes down to, I think. The evangelicals in particular will vote for Trump, not because they think he is a shining example of anything they profess to admire, but because St. Paul thinks that men should rule over women. As you can see, my Trump Anxiety is growing by the day. This is a virus that is affecting liberals all over the country, and it is contagious. I was just on the phone to a friend in another small town in Iowa (not Fairfield) and explained my beliefs about how the election would turn out. Now she has Trump Anxiety too. It's contagious! Not only that, it may well be long-lasting -- it could be four years or even eight before we get over it! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : (Only three presidential debates, Ollie.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <olliesedwuz@...> wrote : The article shared has in it the further seeds of Trump's destruction - He has nothing to substantiate, or further define himself, for the upcoming debates. He doesn't even want to prepare for them, believing that the "terrible twos" OCD act that worked so well in the Primaries will see him through again. Should make a grand incoherent ranting fool of himself, and Clinton probably has a few baited hooks with which to further stump the Trump. By the fourth debate he will be shouting himself hoarse that the debates are rigged, but with numbers plummeting, no one will be listening. Believing the blizzard of BS and his patient army of ass-kissers, he is seriously underestimating Clinton's knowledge and experience, and her ability to clearly call out his absolute lack of both, on stage. Can't wait, and pass the popcorn. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <olliesedwuz@...> wrote : Well written, and factual. http://theweek.com/articles/648712/case-against-donald-trump http://theweek.com/articles/648712/case-against-donald-trump Very much worth the read. I know/realize all this and more - the man is a complete menace to all decency and what we hold dear in this country, in our lives. What is maddening is when you get these idiot radicals blowing up things in the US or abroad and it becomes instant fodder for Trump to spew more of his "I told you so" and "Only I can keep you safe from the Muslim threat". This is not good timing and I curse these terrorist imbeciles every time they do something because it only furthers Trumps rhetoric in the eyes of the gullible, shallow-thinking supporters he seems to draw to himself.
