---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
Bill's accusers came forward immediately. Not true. Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones didn't go public for five years. Juanita Broaddrick, for 20 years. Most of Trump's accusers came out much less than 30 years later. Trumps, as many as thirty years later in the middle of a political campaign with media bending over backwards, trying to discredit him. Hillary can't win on merit or accomplishments and has high negativity rating. All she can do is find a way to make Trump look more negative than her. Locker room talk dude! I don't know, maybe you haven't been around many men in a testosterone filled environment. Can get pretty crude at times and usually does. From: feste37 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers are, of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things are "horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he did those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his words. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote : So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the hell? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
