I hope you're just joking. This is an utterly ridiculous idea. The very last thing Trump would want, or consent to, is to be publicly declared a "loser."
For those interested, two "enlightening" articles that appeared today about the Trump campaign's plans for after the election (win or lose): http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-27/inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-27/inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go http://www.salon.com/2016/10/28/will-donald-trumps-uprising-go-global-even-if-he-loses/ http://www.salon.com/2016/10/28/will-donald-trumps-uprising-go-global-even-if-he-loses/ ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote : noozguru, yep, I've begun to wonder if there's some very bizarre deal bt Clinton and Trump. This morning it's reported that he's advocating not having an election, just give the win to him! It's almost insane to think that he's not throwing the election her way by his extreme behavior. Oh, what a movie it would make. (-: From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess. Conservative Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal. In fact he may be to the left of Clinton. They're buddies too so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people. I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others. I thought the Sanders was a long shot but he did well in his campaign. I think he should still be the Democratic Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to get him out of the race. Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade agreements, job loss and wars of empire. Clinton just tries to snow her followers. On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote: I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the election arrives. I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote : LOL! And just how are these polls conducted? Have you not read that this election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up? The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber. Ho-hum. Welcome to politics South American style. Sal On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in Iowa.