Actually, the only person who has this "feeling" appears to be the moderator himself.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote : For those who may be new to lurking FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group, I want to be clear that as a spiritual Yahoo-group we do not support any one mundane political candidate over any other candidate. However there seems a communal feeling by some here that is both spiritual and postmodern scientific that Natural Law, quite evidently when enlivened by the individual and group practice of effective transcendent meditation, will support a best outcome for the nation and world. P.P.S., This does not mean that we, as individuals, do not support specific candidates. We may do so, offline. And we could be sure to exercise a civic duty and vote for the candidates we believe will serve a nation in the most evolutionary way. Welcome to FairfieldLife, -Jai Guru You FairfieldLife, a (spiritual) Yahoo-group: Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but a conversation about spiritual questions. What did it mean for our spiritual lives? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote : We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess. Conservative Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal. Uh, no. In fact he may be to the left of Clinton. Uh, no. They're buddies too Uh, no. so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people. I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others. I thought the Sanders was a long shot ("the Sanders"??) but he did well in his campaign. I think he should still be the Democratic Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to get him out of the race. Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes). Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade agreements, job loss and wars of empire. Clinton just tries to snow her followers. Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk who has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She snows people because she's so obviously qualified to be president. On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote: I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the election arrives. I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote : LOL! And just how are these polls conducted? Have you not read that this election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up? The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber. Ho-hum. Welcome to politics South American style. Sal On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in Iowa.