--- Vaj wrote: > > >> Vaj wrote: > >> I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure > >> vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be > >> enlightenment. > >> > > Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you > need to perfect the generation stage before perfecting a completion > stage practice, like consort practice.
Oh, I think I understand. I had missed the notion that this fellow had taken a consort as part of his spiritual path -- that the sex was for awakening, as opposed to being for all the other joys of sex. I can see how such a path may entail some prerequisites. So, is the controversy centered on the monk's claims to a certain level of spiritual development? I had taken it as more of an old-fashioned teacher-consorting-with-student controversy. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
