This whole DOJ thing smells so insincere. So we are to beleive that for years DOJ stood by and watched Domash, Haglin Bevin and other faculty fairly openly get tons of student / staff / community wife nookie, and undoubtlely heard their exploits -- as he worked closely with them. And then after 30 years, FINALLY he decided he would, for the VERY FIRST time, venture down the road towards student nookiedom. BUT was so inept at making a pass (such a quaint word) he apparently pissed the target off so much that she raised a huge ruckus causing a minor scandal?
What is wrong with this picture? 1) Is this the type of thing one STARTS at age 62 (or so) for the VERY FIRST TIME? 2) Do women who receive ONE single gentle and discrete pass by a person of stature generally raise a huge ruckus about it? Or do they smile, take it as a compliment, firmly say no (if they are not inclined) and wait for repeated and cruder attempts before raising a ruckus? 3) Does one issue a highly parased, highly specific denial of some limited events if they are not trying trying to divert attention from a broader set of events? Maybe, but why? 4) Does a well published, world traveled, mature, professor of psychology make that inept of a pass? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 2006, at 4:52 PM, a_non_moose_ff wrote: > > > Thats why David's highly parsed note appears odd to me. "I have never > > before or since made a pass." OK. Few if any professors who have sex > > with students, staff or even CPs do make passes. Maybe David just has > > an innocent way about him, and is oblivious to the ways of student or > > staff / factulty affairs. Hard to believe, but perhaps. > > The sentence, "And contrary to the rumor, I have never before or since > made a pass at any course participant, or staff." is easily the most > interesting part, IMO, since it pretty much leaves open the question of > whether or not he was making passes at anyone *not* a course > participant, or staff...like students, or anyone else. > > > Of course, it raises the question -- is this any of our business? > > Or course not, but since when did that stop any conversations here? > For me, at least, it's not what any of these current or former TMO > bigwigs do or didn't do, it's the hypocrisy--telling everyone else to > do one set of things, and then surreptitiously doing the opposite. Is > that possibly why they were asked to leave? If so, how do the others > keep getting away with it? And what about Rhoda's response? I think I > see the makings of a soap opera here. > > > For > > the most part, probably not. But student faculty affairs at a > > university "promoting" celibacy among its students, seems a bit > > inappropriate. And David's highly parsed response just raises more > > questions than it answers. > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
