--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Turquioise - what a great idea! > I do it in another way. Saying in my Advertisements that I teach > techniques in Stress Release and that I have been a Teacher in > Transcendental Meditation since 1975. No one can stop me from > telling a big part of my life. But in Norway it is easier, because > The TMO has been denied to trademark Transcendental Meditation and I > have bought a domene with transcendentalmeditation. But if Mike > lose, it is a lot of ways to tell people what you are teaching. You > gave me some creative ideas here. > Ingegerd
Was that a typo Indegerd? What is "domene with transcendentalmeditation"? What is "domene"? > > > Free introductory lecture on BubbaMed, > > the $100 meditation technique that was > > recently sued by the Transcendental > > Meditation organization because they > > felt it was was competing with the > > $2500 meditation technique they sell. > > Come and listen for yourself, and make > > an informed decision. > > > > :-) :-) :-) > > > > Basically, I still have enough residual trust in the > > courts of America to hope that the TMO will *lose* > > this case, and big-time. (*Especially* if Jim's lawyers > > are smart enough to show the judges photos of the Rajas > > in their robes and crowns.) But if they don't, the > > decision will reflect badly on the TMO, not on the > > teachers who continue to teach "BubbaMed" or whatever > > they choose to call what they teach. > > > > The public is not stupid -- when presented with an > > organization that sues its own for no other reason than > > TO MAKE MORE MONEY, they'll know where to go if they > > want to learn a technique of meditation that is still > > priced to appeal to someone who isn't rich. > > > > Let the elitists appeal to the elitists they want to > > recruit into their cult. If you feel the call to teach, > > you can find a way to do so. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tmforlife108" > > <tmforlife108@> wrote: > > > > > > Regarding the dirt that one supporter of Mike Scozzari > requested, > > I know that item is not > > > central to Mike's defense. Mike told me he just wants everybody > to > > be able to teach TM > > > openly without fear and threats from the so called trademark > > holder. If someone gets a > > > masters in education, pays for their education themselves, the > > university has no right to > > > try and take the degree back 30 years later! > > > > > > But to the post from someone (below) who wrote that there would > > not be precedent, I > > > think you are way off. > > > > > > Don't be naive - winning this will be winning it for everybody > and > > we can end this for > > > good. > > > > > > I'm guessing this was written by an attny, possibly with the > TMO > > as he must realize it will > > > set precedent. He is just trying to sidestep that issue, which > > for supporters that are TM > > > teachers would be the most important issue. If they win, the > TMO > > could serve the papers > > > on other independent teachers using the TM trademark - and THEY > > WILL- precedent has > > > power! What independent teacher would risk it if the TMO wins > > the case in Florida? > > > > > > The trademark holder in this case has a long history of misusing > > that trademark. Do we > > > need to go over this again? A judge knows that threats against > > the trademark not acted > > > on by the TMO do not amount to defending the trademark. If you > > know someone is > > > misusing the trademark and has done so for years, threatening > them > > with phone calls is > > > not defending the trademark, it's harassment. The courts will > > have this information as it > > > unravels. If TM is going to continue to be available I agree - > it > > will be thanks to the > > > independents. They just need to see the importance of this case > in > > Florida and help with > > > the defense. > > > > > > Who can honestly say that the TMO is headed in the right > > direction? > > > > > > Daniel Jeffers > > > > > > One friend who has a spiritual take wrote this.... > > > The Bastards are abusing us, the legitimate teachers of M's > > knowledge, As they have for > > > the Past 25 Years. This is nothing new. Their deliberate > > intention is to crush us and take > > > away our livelihood & our sacred mission to help people in > need. > > They use intimidation, > > > they use divide & conquer. They brainwash our friends & turn > them > > against us. They > > > attempt to isolate us from our friends. They are demons playing > > the destructive role that > > > demons always play. Everyone on the planet has to battle > against > > demons of various > > > kinds, whether in the form of family members or bosses or > > government authorities, > > > criminals, terrorists, etc. etc. Can you imagine the karma > > associated with actively > > > attempting to stop people from becoming enlightened, and to stop > > people from having > > > their suffering alleviated? > > > > > > > > > From: a_non_moose_ff > > > Subject: Re: Mike Scozarri being sued > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > <fairfieldlife@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Someone sent me the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > This is serious. > > > > > > > > He needs a legal defense fund. > > > > > > Does he have a case to argue? He is using a trademarked name > > against > > > the wishes of the trademark holder. And depending what > agreements > > he > > > signed at his TTC or beyond, he may be violating a contract. > > > > > > > > > > And he needs all the 'dirt' on the movement > > > > that we can discover. And people willing to be witnesses, etc. > > > > > > Why would "dirt" on the TMO be relevant in trial to determine if > > Mike > > > is breaking trademark law? If the TMO broke other laws, they > would > > > need to be tried for that. Is the "poster" suggesting sexie- sadie > > > files or ru dissatisfaction with fund raising will make a jury > > go "oh > > > dear, then their trademark is no good."? > > > > > > > If he loses this, then there will be legal precedent > > > > > > Where is there precedent? Is an appeals court hearing the case > > already > > > -- interpreting new unsettled issues in trademerk and contract > law? > > > > > > > and they will go after > > > > EVERYONE that is teaching > > > > > > And why does the TMO winning the scozarri case make them more > > likely > > > to do that? And why does losing it make them less likely? > > > > > > >and that will be the end of it. No more TM > > > > technique. Because the independents are the only one really > > > teaching. > > > > > > How many are teaching in the US -- using TMO trademarks? Just a > > > handful I would imagine. Its all ready pretty much over. > > > > > > Though teaching "Beatles meditation" or "TransX Meditation" by > > word of > > > mouth should not be a problem. > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
