--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > > On Mar 12, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:
> > > 
> > > > It is just the observation that evolving in nature happens 
> > > > through errors and in animals also by avoiding the mistakes 
> > > > and as even in a more advanced form  humans can sometimes 
> > > > also learn from mistakes. I consider the manifest creation 
> > > > to be expression of God or one aspect of God.
> > > 
> > > Ah, a Creator God. Yeah, they screw up all the time, esp. 
> > > at the start. :-)
> > 
> > LOL. 
> > 
> > Being essentially a Buddhist w.r.t. to "creation"
> > (that is, believing that there never *was* one, and
> > that the universe has always been, is now, and will
> > always be) I've always been interested in how much of
> > theology seems to be based on linear thinking. 
> > 
> > If one begins with the assumption that there was a 
> > creation (a start), and that things evolve towards 
> > dissolution (an end), then the need to posulate a 
> > Creator intellectually arises.
> > 
> > If you further assume that there have been multiple
> > creations, with a 'gap' between the dissolution of 
> > one and the creation of the next, *again* the need 
> > to postulate a Creator arises. (Because if the 'next'
> > creation actually is 'created,' then some Creator
> > energy or intelligence must have been present during 
> > the 'gap' between creations to create the next one.
> > 
> > On the other hand, if one starts with the assumption
> > that the universe is eternal, and that there has never
> > been a moment in which it was not manifest, and never
> > will be, then there is no intellectual need to postu-
> > ate a Creator. The need for a Creator is very much
> > dependent on the assumption that there was once a
> > creation.
> >
> +++ Did you read "the greatest miracle" by Og Mandino?
>     In it was a "memorandom from God" which contained 
> quite a bit of information on this latest creation.

Haven't read it, or any of his books.

>     Believing or not is a choice sometimes and, I 
> enjoyed the story. N

I enjoy good stories, too, even the ones associated
with gods and creations myths I may not personally 
believe in. Sometimes a good story is just a good 
story, similar to the way that a cigar is just a 
cigar.  :-)








------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to