--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm pointing out that it's > > > > nonsensical for you to ask *me* to prove the experts > > > > were right in thinking there were anomalies significant > > > > enough to warrant investigation. > > > > > > If all you are saying inall of this is the experts thoughtthere were > > > anomalies significant enough to warrant investigation" fine, no > > > disagreemnt. I have said nothing to contradict this obvious point. > > > > That's all I've ever said. Why have you been arguing > > with me if you agree? > > Because you have said the stock volumes have factually been shown to > be statistically significant anomolies of normal long run trading > patterns, yet you failed to cite any study or investigation that > concludes that.
Because that was the *premise* of the investigations, not what the investigations were trying to determine. They investigated *because* the anomalies were statistically significant, as Mark Meredith has just told you, and as I've been telling you all along. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
