--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 4/6/06 11:16 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:47 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Apr 6, 2006, at 6:11 AM, sparaig wrote: > >>> > >>>> And yet, what if MMY *was* being considered for the position until > >>>> his chart was made? Justifying his lack of position due to his > >> chart > >>>> certainly gives him an out that admitting that his family name was > >>>> recognized as "unworthy" by the Jyotishi doesn't. > >>> > >>> What if he hadn't completed his Jedi training? > >>> > >> > >> Ihave it on good authority that his light sabre was of the highest > >> quality. > > > > Which girl told you that? > > "Girl" doesn't necessarily mean underage. When the Beatles sang "Girl" > (Norwegian Wood) they weren't referring to a 14-year-old. >
Useage changes. In the early 70's, women would jump all over me for using "girl" to refer to anyone post-puberty. For the most part, this seems to have become standard. The only way you can avoid it is to refer to boys AND girls or be so much older that people forgive you for using it in a non-standard way. E.G. my mother referring to Robert Redford as a handsome boy. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
