--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <fairfieldlife@>
> wrote:
> >I
> > have several friends who Awakened recently, and they say that
soon
> > thereafter, the shit hit the fan. They began feeling guilt and
other
> > emotions that needed dealing with a thousand times more
intensely than
> > before their awakening. Maybe that's in store for me. Maybe not.
> Stay tuned.
>
> Asking the same question that you asked Vaj, why do you make
> unprovable assumption that these people are Awakened? Or that the
> label "Awakening" has much of a common connotation to many -- and
thus
> elucidates more than it obscures?
>
> It would appear that saying, "several friends said that recently
the
> shit hit the fan. They began feeling guilt and other emotions that
> needed dealing with a thousand times more intensely than they have
> experienced before. Maybe that's in store for me. Maybe not. Stay
> tuned." gets across the idea you were trying to make but without
the
> use of i) unprovable assumption (your words) and, ii) many-meaning
> labels.
>
> Why is "Awakening", even if it meant the same to all folks,
relevant
> for this point? Are you assuming you will be "awakened" soon? More
> imminent than you figured on on any other day in the past 32 years?
> (37-5=32)
>
The Self in each of us recognizes the Self in another. We are
conscious of this to one degree or another, whether our Self has
been fully awakened to us, or not.

This is how someone somewhat Awake will recognize another who is
fully Awake, and vice versa.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Religion and spirituality Maharishi mahesh yogi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to