On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:22 PM, authfriend wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Paul Mason wrote:

<snip>

And so it is with the alleged poisoning of Guru Dev, why on earth

should I side with Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand? I never met 

the man and besides, in the interview with RK he was using 

anything he could to try and discredit him. It seems their 

friction goes a long way back, perhaps as far back as 1940.


Honestly? I think it remains an unresolved question, but it's  

important to pose the question.


No, no.  You didn't mention it in the form of a

question, you mentioned it as an established

fact.  You said you had "heard about the murder"

from your friend.



Actually what I said was:

"I first heard from one of the people mentioned in the Sexie Sadie article who interviewed one of the women. While I have not spoken to any of the women first hand, I did talk at length with this gentleman just after he talked to her--an old and close friend--and his recollection was just jaw dropping at the time. This wasn't just a rumor. He also was interestingly the first person I heard of the poisoning from."

I did later add:

"Yes, that he was the leading suspect. The first time I heard it was in the mid 80's after he returned from a pilgrimage to Jyotir Math and the Valley of the Flowers.

Now THAT did shock me. It angered me to even hear it."

This was to share my own shock, disbelief and inability to accept these events.

Notice there is no mention of the word "murder" as Judy falsely claims.

This is yet another example of why I ignore most of her posts: deliberate falsifications.
__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to