--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 11:18:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > jstein@ writes: > > > > > Ban anything that can be used to determine the sex of the > fetus. > > > Ultrasound while the > > > > mom isn't allowed to look, would be OK, as long as the doctor > > > doesn't reveal the sex. > > > > > > Hey, that might actually work. > > > > > > What about the mothers right to know? > > > > What about it? > > > > > > > > > > Now could you imagine that being said to a prospective mother in > the USA? > > For all the doctor knows, she's coming in for a routine check up > and wants to > > know the sex of her child. She doesn't have to make a decision to > abort before > > she knows all the facts. > > > > If abortion wasn't "killing", no one would give a rat's ass about > whether or not they knew the sex of the fetus. > > This whole discussion exposes the extreme discomfort various parties > to this debate have when the same so-called freedom to choose is > provided within another context: the right to know the sex of your > fetus should be no less a right than the right to reproductive > freedom. >
Heh. I'm talking about the social consequences of having single-sex familes on a scale of 10's or even 100's of millions, and you've boiled it down to a "abortion is bad and we all know it" thing. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
