--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of course, I assume that intentional transcending is > actually a different physical state than spontaneous > transcending, and that the former is an illusion, > while the latter is based on a simple physical change > in how the brain processes information, as a for > example of where I'm coming from.
So you're saying, essentially, that the fundamental assumption and bias you bring to any TM research that you participate in is based on the idea of elitism, that TM is unique and better than any other technique, right? Again, thanks for being honest about the level of your TM elitism, but I think that as a result we can safely disregard anything you might "discover" in conjunction with Fred as actually having anything to do with science. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
