Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A theory of Karma, TMOers, and the TMO's "Persona"

[llundrub]

People here are wayyy past MMY bashing. MMY could aspire to live up to some of the theories. ----- Original Message ----- From: Louis McKenzie To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A theory of Karma, TMOers, and the TMO's "Persona" Well Guys what does one get from MMY Bashing.  Is there some thrill in it?     Figure if you have time to MMY bash that means you are not doing all you can do to benefit from any of the things anyway.   So maybe there is a nother consciousness at hand.  In the world especially US there are many people who are born cryers.   If they dont see where they are getting their satisfaction they cry fraud.     I had a good friend he built a company that sold water purification multilevel.  The US Gov.  too him and his compnay down because some people who jumped in jumped in with all they had plus in order to get RICH.  WHen they found things weren't quite like they were told they decided to sue.    Basically there are many people like me who have read the GITA a zillion times because MMY said that each time you read chapter 2 it brings you closer to CC.   Nice line of Bullshit.     But maybe it was not complete BS.   The thing is TM has value meditation is valuable.   So maybe there is more to do.  Well look at all the more that has come about in the last 30 years.   maybe it is better to take the value and do what you need to do than to sit around wasting time complaining???????= Nothing better to do???  OH BOY! ----- Original Message ---- From: sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 2:29:32 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A theory of Karma, TMOers, and the TMO's "Persona" --- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Vaj <vajranatha@ ...> wrote: > > > On Oct 27, 2006, at 1:46 PM, jim_flanegin wrote: > > > Geez, really hard to say. Rather I think it is a case of trying to > > explain the enigma that Maharishi appears to be to so many, in a not > > very positive way. I do get the sense that Vaj indulges in a far > > amount of Maharishi and TM bashing 'off camera'. > > > No, it was merely a counterpoint, an "all possibilities" POV to New > Morn's rosy romanticism and the rose-colors glasses he seems to wear > much of the time. > > For example, how do you ignore that the era of good times of New > Morn's first phase also corresponded to his Spiritual Incest phase? I > don't know, but it received not a mention. Bizarre. > perhaps because New Morning never saw it and chooses not to assume that hearsay is true? __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___