--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 11, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Rick Archer wrote: > > > > > > > For this they use several translators. Three inside the group > > > > but some outside the fence/cage. (The pundits' living area is > a > > > > cantonment surrounded by a high chain link fence, covered with > > > > a tarp, so that they cannot get out or even see out, except > > > > out the rear in the direction of some private stapathya ved > > > > homes, nor can others get or see in.) > > > > My personal feeling it's not the best for them. > > > > > > Understatement of the year. Is this even legal? Once more the > > > TMO goes out of its way to show its warmth, friendliness, and > > > ability to deal effectively with reality. What's next, I > > > wonder--underground bunkers? > > > > "What's next" is fairly obvious. One or more of these > > pundit kids is going to make a break for it, and leave > > the compound. What the TM movement *does* about that > > will be interesting to see. > > Unlike Tibetan Buddhism, which doesn't even *try* to do anything > regarding world peace, which is appropriate given its utter failure > within Tibet itself.
A little angry are we today, Jim? :-) I'm not a strict Tibetan Buddhist, but even if I were it wouldn't bother me in the least what you think about it or say about it. What you think about it or say about it does not affect me in any way. THAT is my whole point in going through this exercise with you. What other people believe -- their OPINION -- about TM affects you very much, enough that you get angry and start to badrap the other person's supposed belief system when they say something about TM that you don't like. The reason for this is called attachment.
